Republican Congressman says: Eligibility too scary to take on
I think most Republicans in Congress know Obama is not eligible
to be President, but simply don’t have the kajonies to do anything about it.
Monday, April 30, 2012
NO HE CAN'T
Anne Wortham is Associate Professor of Sociology at Illinois State University and continuing Visiting
Scholar at Stanford University 's Hoover Institution.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
WHO IS RACIST Part 2
Who Is 'Racist'? Part II
By Thomas Sowell
Around
this time of year, I sometimes hear from parents who have been appalled
to learn that the child they sent away to college to become educated
has instead been indoctrinated with the creed of the left. They often
ask if I can suggest something to have their offspring read over the
summer, in order to counteract this indoctrination.
This year the answer is a no-brainer. It is a book with the unwieldy title, No Matter What ...They'll Call This Book Racist by Harry Stein, a writer for what is arguably America's best magazine, City Journal. In a little over 200 very readable pages, the author deftly devastates with facts the nonsense about race that dominates much of what is said in the media and in academia.
There is no subject on which lies and half-truths have become so much
the norm on ivy-covered campuses than is the subject of race. Moreover,
anyone who even questions these lies and half-truths is almost certain
to be called a "racist," especially in academic institutions which
loudly proclaim a "diversity" that is confined to demographics, and all
but forbidden when it comes to a diversity of ideas.
The ultimate irony is that many of those who publicly promote or accept the prevailing party line on race do not themselves accept it privately. A few years ago, when a faculty vote on affirmative action was proposed at the University of California at Berkeley, there was a fierce disagreement as to whether that vote should be taken by secret ballot or at an open faculty meeting.
Both sides understood that many professors would vote one way in secret and the opposite way in public. In short, hypocrisy is the norm in discussions of race -- and not just at Berkeley. Moreover, it is the norm among blacks as well as whites.
Black civil rights attorneys and activists who denounce whites for objecting to the busing of kids from the ghetto into their neighborhood schools have not hesitated to send their own children to private schools, instead of subjecting them to this kind of "diversity" in the public schools.
As for whites, author Harry Stein says that many white liberals "give blacks a pass on behaviors and attitudes they would regard as unacceptable and even abhorrent in their own kind." This, of course, is no favor to those particular blacks -- especially those among young ghetto blacks whose counterproductive behavior puts them on a path that leads nowhere but to welfare, at best, and behind bars or death in gangland street warfare at worst.
In the introduction to his book, Stein says that his purpose is "to talk honestly about race." He accomplishes that purpose in a fact-filled book that should be a revelation, especially to young people of any race, who have been fed a party line in schools and colleges across America.
He looks behind the highly sanitized picture of Al Sharpton, as a civil rights statesman with his own MSNBC program and his designation as a White House adviser, to the factual reality of a man with a trail of slime that has included inciting mobs, in some cases costing innocent lives.
Positive news also receives its due. Some readers of this book may be surprised to learn that the ban on racial preferences in the University of California system did not lead to a disappearance of blacks from the system, as the supporters of affirmative action claimed would happen.
On the contrary, more blacks graduated from the system after the ban -- for the very common sense reason that they were now admitted to University of California campuses where they qualified, rather than to places like UCLA and Berkeley, where they had often been admitted to fill a quota, and often failed.
Stein's book is also one of the few places where many young people will see the actual words of people like Bill Cosby, Shelby Steele, Pat Moynihan and others who have opposed the fashionable platitudes that confuse racial issues.
Whether those words convince all readers is not the point. The point, especially for young readers in our schools and colleges, is that this may be one of the few times they will ever encounter a fundamentally different set of views on race -- views that they have only heard referred to as coming from "Uncle Toms" or "racists."
This year the answer is a no-brainer. It is a book with the unwieldy title, No Matter What ...They'll Call This Book Racist by Harry Stein, a writer for what is arguably America's best magazine, City Journal. In a little over 200 very readable pages, the author deftly devastates with facts the nonsense about race that dominates much of what is said in the media and in academia.
The ultimate irony is that many of those who publicly promote or accept the prevailing party line on race do not themselves accept it privately. A few years ago, when a faculty vote on affirmative action was proposed at the University of California at Berkeley, there was a fierce disagreement as to whether that vote should be taken by secret ballot or at an open faculty meeting.
Both sides understood that many professors would vote one way in secret and the opposite way in public. In short, hypocrisy is the norm in discussions of race -- and not just at Berkeley. Moreover, it is the norm among blacks as well as whites.
Black civil rights attorneys and activists who denounce whites for objecting to the busing of kids from the ghetto into their neighborhood schools have not hesitated to send their own children to private schools, instead of subjecting them to this kind of "diversity" in the public schools.
As for whites, author Harry Stein says that many white liberals "give blacks a pass on behaviors and attitudes they would regard as unacceptable and even abhorrent in their own kind." This, of course, is no favor to those particular blacks -- especially those among young ghetto blacks whose counterproductive behavior puts them on a path that leads nowhere but to welfare, at best, and behind bars or death in gangland street warfare at worst.
In the introduction to his book, Stein says that his purpose is "to talk honestly about race." He accomplishes that purpose in a fact-filled book that should be a revelation, especially to young people of any race, who have been fed a party line in schools and colleges across America.
He looks behind the highly sanitized picture of Al Sharpton, as a civil rights statesman with his own MSNBC program and his designation as a White House adviser, to the factual reality of a man with a trail of slime that has included inciting mobs, in some cases costing innocent lives.
Positive news also receives its due. Some readers of this book may be surprised to learn that the ban on racial preferences in the University of California system did not lead to a disappearance of blacks from the system, as the supporters of affirmative action claimed would happen.
On the contrary, more blacks graduated from the system after the ban -- for the very common sense reason that they were now admitted to University of California campuses where they qualified, rather than to places like UCLA and Berkeley, where they had often been admitted to fill a quota, and often failed.
Stein's book is also one of the few places where many young people will see the actual words of people like Bill Cosby, Shelby Steele, Pat Moynihan and others who have opposed the fashionable platitudes that confuse racial issues.
Whether those words convince all readers is not the point. The point, especially for young readers in our schools and colleges, is that this may be one of the few times they will ever encounter a fundamentally different set of views on race -- views that they have only heard referred to as coming from "Uncle Toms" or "racists."
RACISM WILL NEVER DIE
Racism will never die in this country as long as we have
racist teaching in our schools.
In fact, it will continue to get worse.
Friday, April 27, 2012
COULD OBAMA HAVE WON LEGALLY IN 2008?
JOHN McCAIN IGNORED VOTER FRAUD TO AVOID CIVIL UNREST.
Leaked emails from the intelligence group Stratfor recently revealed some shocking allegations of massive Democrat voter fraud in 2008. The emails revealed by WikiLeaks say that the McCain campaign decided to ignore the wide spread voter fraud in order to avoid massive civil unrest — even though it meant he’d lose the White House.
The emails say that Democrats were caught “stuffing ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio,” but the McCain campaign decided to let it all go.
After discussions with his inner circle, which explains the delay in his speech, McCain decided not to pursue the voter fraud in PA and Ohio, despite his staff’s desire to make it an issue. He said no. Staff felt they could get a federal injunction to stop the process. McCain felt the crowds assembled in support of Obama and such would be detrimental to our country and it would do our nation no good for this to drag out like last go around, coupled with the possibility of domestic violence.
J. Christian Adams, a former United States Department of Justice official, notes how fraught with danger these revelations are.
With the blessings of hindsight, we see that fear of mob violence in our country is no longer a hypothetical in the mind of a presidential candidate. The call by the New Black Panther Party in Sanford, Florida, to seize (or kill) a private citizen is no longer the stuff of a senator’s imagination.
Adams was the member of the Justice Dept. that revealed to the world that Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, decided not to prosecute the obvious law breaking perpetrated in Philadelphia by the Black Panthers during the 2008 general election.
Adams feels we are an inch away from major civil unrest as Democrats look to increase voter fraud in order to keep control in Washington and attempt to get away with it by using the threat of civil unrest to intimidate Republicans into turning a blind eye to it all… OR ELSE.
This is exactly the sort of law breaking we’ve come to expect from the Democrat Party. It will get worse before it gets better but that doesn’t mean we should ignore it.
HOW LONG BEFORE WE BECOME AN ISLAMIC STATE
Muslim Brotherhood's reach extends to White House
At this rate, how long before we become an Islamic state?
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
BREAKING NEWS
Supreme Court casts doubt on Obama’s immigration law claim
From The Washington TimesSupreme Court justices took a dim view of the Obama administration's claim that it can stop Arizona from enforcing immigration laws, telling government lawyers during oral argument Wednesday that the state appears to want to push federal officials, not conflict with them.
The court was hearing arguments on Arizona's immigration crackdown law, which requires police to check the immigration status of those they suspect are in the country illegally, and would also write new state penalties for illegal immigrants who try to apply for jobs.
The Obama administration has sued, arguing that those provisions conflict with the federal government's role in setting immigration policy, but justices on both sides of the aisle struggled to understand that argument.
"It seems to me the federal government just doesn't want to know who's here illegally," Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said at one point.
The Arizona law requires all police to check with federal officials if they suspect someone is in the country illegally. The government argues that is OK when it's on a limited basis, but said having a state mandate for all of its law enforcement is essentially a method of trying to force the federal government to change its priorities.
Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. said the federal government has limited resources and should have the right to determine the extent of calls it gets about possible illegal immigrants.
"These decisions have to be made at the national level," he said.
But even Democratic-appointed justices were uncertain of that.
"I'm terribly confused by your answer," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who went on to say that the federal government can always decline to pick up illegal immigrants when Arizona officials call.
The Obama administration was on its firmest ground when it argued Arizona should not be allowed to impose state penalties such as jail time against illegal immigrants who try to seek jobs.
Federal law chiefly targets employers, not employees, and Mr. Verrilli said adding stiffer penalties at the state level is not coordination. He said Congress's 1986 immigration law laying out legal penalties was meant to be a comprehensive scheme, and Congress left employees untouched — and Justice Sotomayor seemed to agree.
"It seems odd to think the federal government is deciding on employer sanctions and has unconsciously decided not to punish employees," she told Paul D. Clement, who argued the case on behalf of Arizona.
A decision is expected before the end of the court's term this summer.
Only eight justices were present for the arguments. Justice Elana Kagan recused herself from the case, presumably because she was the Obama administration's solicitor general in 2010, when the law was being debated in Arizona.
Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the measure into law, was present for the arguments, as were members of Congress who follow the immigration issue: Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the House immigration subcommittee, and Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican who has fought for an immigration crackdown.
Critics have said the law, known as SB 1070, will lead to racial profiling of Hispanics in Arizona. But the Obama administration has not challenged the law on those grounds, instead focusing on issues of federal versus state power.
Mr. Verrilli said Arizona's goal is to try to force the federal government to change its priorities, but he said those policies are designed at the national level in order to balance concerns over available resources and international relations.
"What [Arizona is] going to do is engage effectively in mass incarceration," he said. "It poses a very serious risk of raising serious foreign relations problems."
Some of the justices, including Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., seemed concerned that allowing police to perform immigration checks could end up leading citizens being held even longer during stops by police.
Mr. Clement said the law still complies with the Fourth Amendment's limits on unreasonable searches.
Anticipating an unfavorable ruling, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat who is a critic of the Arizona law, said Tuesday that if the court does uphold the state's law, he will introduce legislation to overturn that decision and grant the federal government sole control on immigration matters.
Mr. Schumer's legislation would also overturn a 2011 Supreme Court case that upheld a separate Arizona law that requires all businesses in the state to check employees' legal status using E-Verify, the federal government's electronic verification system.
In that instance Congress specifically left open the chance for states to pass their own business licensing laws, and in a 5-3 ruling the justices upheld Arizona's attempt.
Since Arizona passed its laws, other states have followed suit. Local enforcement laws have been adopted in a half-dozen states, though all have been challenged in court. Still states have adopted requirements that businesses use E-Verify.
IT'S NOW A FELONY
IT IS NOW A FELONY TO PROTEST
IN THE PRESENCE OF HIS ROYAL MAJESTY KING BARRY THE FIRST.
This is a new law signed by Obama in early
March 2012 which makes it illegal to protest in his presence. Regardless of where you stand politically,
this is very scary. This sounds more like Nazi Germany than The United States we use to know.
The law means that wherever Obama is you do not have a right to ask him anything you want to. His secret service can have you arrested, fined, and imprisoned for more than a YEAR if you ask him something he doesn't like or doesn't want to answer. Watch this video and send the link to this blog post to every freedom loving person you know.
The law means that wherever Obama is you do not have a right to ask him anything you want to. His secret service can have you arrested, fined, and imprisoned for more than a YEAR if you ask him something he doesn't like or doesn't want to answer. Watch this video and send the link to this blog post to every freedom loving person you know.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
WHO IS RACIST
IF you know me, or have been reading my blog for a while,
then you probably know I am a big fan of Thomas Sowell
WHO IS RACIST By
Thomas Sowell
Whatever the ultimate outcome of the case against George
Zimmerman for his shooting of Trayvon Martin, what has happened already is
enough to turn the stomach of anyone who believes in either truth or justice.One of the first things presented in the media was a transcript of a conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher. The last line in most of the transcripts shown on TV was that of the police dispatcher telling Zimmerman not to continue following Trayvon Martin.
That became the basis of many media criticisms of Zimmerman for continuing to follow him. Only later did I see a transcript of that conversation on the Sean Hannity program that included Zimmerman's reply to the police dispatcher: "O.K."
That reply removed the only basis for assuming that Zimmerman did in fact continue to follow Trayvon Martin. At this point, neither I nor the people who assumed that he continued to follow the teenager have any basis in fact for believing that he did or didn't.
Why was that reply edited out by so many in the media? Because too many people in the media see their role as filtering and slanting the news to fit their own vision of the world. The issue is not one of being "fair" to "both sides" but, more fundamentally, of being honest with their audience.
NBC News carried the editing even further, removing one of the police dispatcher's questions, to which Zimmerman was responding, in order to feed the vision of Zimmerman as a racist.
In the same vein were the repeated references to Zimmerman as a "white Hispanic." Zimmerman is half-white. So is Barack Obama. But does anyone refer to Obama as a "white African"?
All these verbal games grow out of the notion that complexion tells you who is to be blamed and who is not. It is a dangerous game because race is no game. If the tragic history of the old Jim Crow South in this country is not enough to show that, the history of racial and ethnic tragedies is written in blood in countries around the world. Millions have lost their lives because they looked different, talked differently or belonged to a different religion.
In the midst of the Florida tragedy, there was a book published with the unwieldy title, "No Matter What ... They'll Call This Book Racist." Obviously it was written well before the shooting in Florida, but its message -- that there is rampant hypocrisy and irrationality in public discussions of race -- could not have been better timed.
Author Harry Stein, a self-described "reformed white liberal," raised by parents who were even further left, exposes the illogic and outright fraudulence that lies behind so much of what is said about race in the media, in politics and in our educational institutions.
He asks a very fundamental question: "Why, even after the Duke University rape fiasco, does the media continue to give credence to every charge of racism?"
Harry Stein credits Shelby Steele's book "White Guilt" with opening his eyes to one of the sources of many counterproductive things said and done about race today -- namely, guilt about what was done to blacks and other minorities in the past.
Let us talk sense, like adults. Nothing that is done to George Zimmerman -- justly or unjustly -- will unlynch a single black man who was tortured and killed in the Jim Crow South for a crime he didn't commit.
Letting hoodlums get away with hoodlumism today does not undo a single injustice of the past. It is not even a favor to the hoodlums, for many of whom hoodlumism is just the first step on a path that leads to the penitentiary, and maybe to the execution chamber.
Winston Churchill said, "If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." He wasn't talking about racial issues, but what he said applies especially where race is involved.
Monday, April 23, 2012
A BLACK MAN SPEAKING THE TRUTH
A BLACK MAN SPEAKING THE TRUTH
HE CAN SAY IT BUT A
WHITE PERSON COULD NOT
UPSIDE-DOWN WORLD
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- You can get arrested for expired tags on your car
- but not for being in the country illegally.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Your government believes the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt
- is to spend trillions more of our money.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- A seven year old boy can be thrown out of school for calling his teacher "cute"
- but hosting sexual exploration or diversity class in grade school is perfectly acceptable.
===========================================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if....
- The Supreme Court can rule that lower courts
- cannot display the 10 Commandments in their courtroom,
- while sitting in front of a display of the 10 Commandments.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Children are forcibly removed from parents who appropriately discipline them
- while children of "underprivileged" drug addicts are left to rot in filth infested cesspools.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Working class Americans pay for their own health care
- (and the health care of everyone else)
- while unmarried women are free to have child after child on the "State's" dime
- while never being held responsible for their own choices.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Hard work and success are rewarded with higher taxes and government intrusion,
- while slothful, lazy behavior is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks,
- Medicaid and subsidized housing.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- The government's plan for getting people back to work
- is to provide 99 weeks of unemployment checks (to not work).
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Being self-sufficient is considered a threat to the government.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Politicians think that stripping away the amendments to the constitution
- is really protecting the rights of the people.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- The rights of the Government come before the rights of the individual.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Parents believe the State is responsible for providing for their children.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- You can write a post like this just by reading the news headlines.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- You pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big screen TV
- while your neighbor defaults on his mortgage
- (while buying iphones, TV's and new cars)
- and the government forgives his debt and reduces his mortgage
- (with your tax dollars).
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Your government can add anything they want to your kid's water
- (fluoride, chlorine, etc.)
- but you are not allowed to give them raw milk.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you "safe".
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip
- but not to get an abortion.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- An 80 year old woman can be stripped searched by the TSA
- but a Muslim woman in a burqa is only subject to having her neck and head searched.
==========================================
You know you live in an Upside-down Land if...
- Using the "N" word is considered "hate speech"
- but writing and signing songs about raping women and killing cops is considered "art".
==========================================
Unfortunately, this list could go on and
on.
Our world has been turned upside-down.
We are in distress.
Our world has been turned upside-down.
We are in distress.
Where do we go from here?
"COWARDICE asks the question - is it
Safe?"
"EXPEDIENCY asks the question - is it
Politically Correct?"
"VANITY asks the question - is it
Popular?"
"But the CONSCIENCE asks the question -
is it Right?"
"And there comes a time when one must
take a position
that is neither Safe, nor Politically
Correct, nor Popular,
but one must take it, because its RIGHT!!"
YOU HAVE ELECTED HITLER.
YOU HAVE
ELECTED HITLER.
PLEASE DO
NOT RE-ELECT HIM.
Because if you do, there probably will not be any more elections.
OBAMA’S JOBS PROGRAM
USAID training foreign workers for English-speaking jobs
From The Daily CallerWhile the president has been urging “insourcing,” the government has been sending money to the Philippines to train foreign workers for jobs in English-speaking call centers.
According to New York Democratic Rep. Tim Bishop and North Carolina Republican Rep. Walter Jones, this is unacceptable and “shocking.”
The pair are calling on the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to immediately suspend what is known as the Job Enabling English Proficiency (JEEP) program.
According to Jones’ office, in 2010, after the two men compelled USAID to end a similar training program in Sri Lanka, the agency assured the congressmen that they would “conduct a review to ensure the project will not take any jobs away from Americans.”
In a letter to the USAID administrator, Rajiv Shah, Bishop and Jones expressed their displeasure at learning of the effort they thought the agency had explicitly promised against.
“I believe it was reasonable to conclude from that statement that your agency’s outsourcing training program was terminated, particularly in light of President Obama’s ‘insourcing’ initiative announced earlier this year,” the pair wrote. “Therefore, I was shocked to learn that USAID has used taxpayer dollars to invest in outsourcing training programs in the Philippines at the expense of American workers.”.
According to Bishop, more than 4.5 million Americans currently work in call centers, but since 2007 more than 500,000 call center jobs have been outsourced to foreign countries.
Business Week broke the story about the JEEP program this week. According to Business Week, the program is part of the Growth and Equity in Mindanao (GEM) initiative, which costs $100 million annually.
“The JEEP program was developed to promote peace and stability in Mindanao by teaching English to youth in conflict-prone areas to help them pursue gainful employment in tourism, nursing and other locally-based industries and to break the cycle of violence which had gripped that region of the Philippines,” a USAID spokesperson told Business Week, adding that it is set to expire at the end of the year.
The congressmen want it gone yesterday.
“Using Americans’ hard-earned taxpayer dollars to fund the training of foreign nationals to take our jobs is absolutely crazy and totally unacceptable,” Jones said in a statement. “Uncle Sam is over $15 trillion in debt and unemployment is still elevated because of policies like this, and it’s got to stop.”
The pair pledged in their letter to “use every legislative option available to permanently prohibit USAID from engaging in such practices in the future.”
“I support the international development mission of USAID but my top priority is protecting American jobs and American taxpayers,” Bishop concluded. “I anticipate working closely with USAID in a bipartisan manner to ensure that none of its programs overseas will hurt workers here at home.”
Saturday, April 21, 2012
OBAMA LAWYER ADMITS BIRTH CERTIFICATE A FORGERY
Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the
image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim
that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural
born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is
“irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.
Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that
Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in
order to be a candidate.
Hummm..I wonder if the Constitution is required reading in law school.
Do you still think "birthers" are crazy?
DO YOUR COUNTRY A GREAT SERVICE BY SENDING THE LINK
TO THIS BLOG TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
That link worked this morning when I posted it, and now it doesn't.
My guess is Obama had one of his henchmen take it down.
I hope a lot of people got watch the video before it was taken down.
That link worked this morning when I posted it, and now it doesn't.
My guess is Obama had one of his henchmen take it down.
I hope a lot of people got watch the video before it was taken down.
Friday, April 20, 2012
LIBERALS ARE GOING TO KILL MISS PIGGY
Michigan to destroy pigs based on the color of their hair.
That sounds like racial profiling for animal murder
IS OBAMA WITH US OR AGAINST US?
Terrorist Omar Khadr was convicted of using a grenade to kill a U.S. soldier. President Obama is fighting for Khadr’s freedom.
IS OBAMA WITH US OR AGAINST US? SERIOUSLY!
NEW EVIDENCE IN ZIMMERMAN CASE
You may have
seen this video on ABC News this morning, but I did not.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
TORTURE
George Everett " Bud " Day(born February 24, 1925) is a retired
U.S. Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot who served during the
Vietnam War. He is often cited as being the most decorated U.S.
Service member since General Douglas MacArthur, having
received some seventy decorations, a majority for actions
in combat.
U.S. Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot who served during the
Vietnam War. He is often cited as being the most decorated U.S.
Service member since General Douglas MacArthur, having
received some seventy decorations, a majority for actions
in combat.
Day is a recipient of the Medal of Honor.
I got shot down over N Vietnam in 1967, a Sqdn. Commander.
After I returned in 1973....I published 2 books that dealt a lot
with "real torture" in Hanoi. Our make-believe president is
branding our country as a bunch of torturers when he has
no idea what torture is.
As for me, I was put thru a mock execution because I would not respond...
Pistol whipped on the head....same event.. Couple of days later...
hung by my feet all day. I escaped and a couple of weeks later, I got
shot and recaptured. Shot was OK...what happened afterwards was not.
They marched me to Vinh...put me in the rope trick, trick...almost
pulled my arms out of the sockets. Beat me on the head with a
little wooden rod until my eyes were swelled shut, and my unshot,
unbroken hand a pulp.
Next day hung me by the arms....rebroke my right wrist...wiped
out the nerves in my arms that control the hands....rolled my fingers
up into a ball. Only left the slightest movement of my L forefinger.
so I started answering with some incredible lies.
Sent me to Hanoi strapped to a barrel of gas in the back of a truck.
Hanoi ..on my knees....rope trick again. Beaten by a big fool.
Into leg irons on a bed in Heartbreak Hotel.
Much kneeling--hands up at Zoo.
Really bad beating for refusing to condemn Lyndon Johnson.
Several more kneeling events. I could see my knee bone thru
kneeling holes.
There was an escape from the annex to the Zoo. I was the Senior
officer of a large building because of escape...they started a mass
torture of all commanders.
I think it was July 7, 1969..they started beating me with a car fan belt.
In first 2 days I took over 300 strokes...then stopped counting
because I never thought I would live thru it.
They continued day-night torture to get me to confess to a non-existent
part in the escape. This went on for at least 3 days. On my knees...
fan belting...cut open my scrotum with fan belt stroke. Opened up
both knee holes again. My fanny looked like hamburger..I could not
lie on my back.
They tortured me into admitting that I was in on the escape...and
that my 2 room-mates knew about it.
The next day I denied the lie.
They commenced torturing me again with 3- 6- or 9 strokes of
the fan belt every day from about July 11 or 12th..to 14 October
1969. I continued to refuse to lie about my roommates again.
Now, the point of this is that our make-believe
president has declared to the world that we (U.S..) are a bunch of
torturers...Thus it will be OK to torture us next time when they
catch us...because that is what the U.S Does.
Our make-believe president is a know nothing fool who thinks
that pouring a little water on some one's face, or hanging a pair of
women's pants over an Arabs head is TORTURE.. He is a meathead.
I just talked to MOH holder Leo Thorsness, who was also in my squadron,
in jail..as was John McCain...and we agree that McCain does
not speak for the POW group when he claims that Al Gharib was
torture...or that "water boarding" is torture.
Our president and those fools around him who keep bad mouthing
our great country are a disgrace to the United States. Please pass
this info on to Sean Hannity. He is free to use it to point out the
stupidity of the claims that water boarding...which has no after
effect...is torture.
If it got the Arab to cough up the story about how he planned the attack on the twin towers in NYC ...
Hurrah for the guy who poured the water!!
After I returned in 1973....I published 2 books that dealt a lot
with "real torture" in Hanoi. Our make-believe president is
branding our country as a bunch of torturers when he has
no idea what torture is.
As for me, I was put thru a mock execution because I would not respond...
Pistol whipped on the head....same event.. Couple of days later...
hung by my feet all day. I escaped and a couple of weeks later, I got
shot and recaptured. Shot was OK...what happened afterwards was not.
They marched me to Vinh...put me in the rope trick, trick...almost
pulled my arms out of the sockets. Beat me on the head with a
little wooden rod until my eyes were swelled shut, and my unshot,
unbroken hand a pulp.
Next day hung me by the arms....rebroke my right wrist...wiped
out the nerves in my arms that control the hands....rolled my fingers
up into a ball. Only left the slightest movement of my L forefinger.
so I started answering with some incredible lies.
Sent me to Hanoi strapped to a barrel of gas in the back of a truck.
Hanoi ..on my knees....rope trick again. Beaten by a big fool.
Into leg irons on a bed in Heartbreak Hotel.
Much kneeling--hands up at Zoo.
Really bad beating for refusing to condemn Lyndon Johnson.
Several more kneeling events. I could see my knee bone thru
kneeling holes.
There was an escape from the annex to the Zoo. I was the Senior
officer of a large building because of escape...they started a mass
torture of all commanders.
I think it was July 7, 1969..they started beating me with a car fan belt.
In first 2 days I took over 300 strokes...then stopped counting
because I never thought I would live thru it.
They continued day-night torture to get me to confess to a non-existent
part in the escape. This went on for at least 3 days. On my knees...
fan belting...cut open my scrotum with fan belt stroke. Opened up
both knee holes again. My fanny looked like hamburger..I could not
lie on my back.
They tortured me into admitting that I was in on the escape...and
that my 2 room-mates knew about it.
The next day I denied the lie.
They commenced torturing me again with 3- 6- or 9 strokes of
the fan belt every day from about July 11 or 12th..to 14 October
1969. I continued to refuse to lie about my roommates again.
Now, the point of this is that our make-believe
president has declared to the world that we (U.S..) are a bunch of
torturers...Thus it will be OK to torture us next time when they
catch us...because that is what the U.S Does.
Our make-believe president is a know nothing fool who thinks
that pouring a little water on some one's face, or hanging a pair of
women's pants over an Arabs head is TORTURE.. He is a meathead.
I just talked to MOH holder Leo Thorsness, who was also in my squadron,
in jail..as was John McCain...and we agree that McCain does
not speak for the POW group when he claims that Al Gharib was
torture...or that "water boarding" is torture.
Our president and those fools around him who keep bad mouthing
our great country are a disgrace to the United States. Please pass
this info on to Sean Hannity. He is free to use it to point out the
stupidity of the claims that water boarding...which has no after
effect...is torture.
If it got the Arab to cough up the story about how he planned the attack on the twin towers in NYC ...
Hurrah for the guy who poured the water!!
FOLLOW-UP on “He speaks the truth”
DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz ripped Nugent’s comments, saying, “Mitt Romney surrogate Ted Nugent made offensive comments about President Obama and November’s elections this weekend that are despicable, deplorable and completely beyond the pale.”
“We have more than 200 days to go in this election,” she added. “If the GOP and Romney are willing to accept this kind of rhetoric at this stage of the campaign, I can’t imagine what they’ll accept in September and October.”
Nugent responded by calling her a “brain-dead, soulless, heartless idiot,” and her remarks merely encouraged him to stand stronger.
“This is the Saul Alinsky ‘Rules for Radicals’ playbook,” Nugent said. “The Nazis and the Klan hate me. See, I’m a black Jew at a Nazi-Klan rally, and there are some power-abusing corrupt monsters in our federal government that despise me because I have the audacity to speak the truth to identify the violations of our government, particularly Eric Holder and the president and Tim Geithner, ad nauseam. And I spoke at the NRA and I will stand by my speech. It was 100 percent positive.
“It’s about ‘We the People’ taking back our American dream from the corrupt monsters in the federal government under this administration and the communist czars he’s appointed. And if anybody has a problem with that, call 1-800-NUMBNUT and [leftist filmmaker] Michael Moore will try to explain it to you as he searches for soap.”
DO YOU FEEL SAFE?
Terrorist can and do come into this country all the time and
we don’t know where they go or what they are doing.
National Guard Maj. Gen. John Nichols said “Our border is
still a sieve and we need more troops on the border, or some law enforcement
agency, or troops to secure the border,”
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK
Obama Stimulus Dollars Funded Soros Empire
Newly recently released tax documents reveal how billionaire “philanthropist” George Soros expanded his U.S.-based empire by using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the Obama stimulus. Soros and Obama worked hand-in-glove through the stimulus, which has been called the largest single partisan wealth transfer in American history.
In 2010, tax records show that Soros, a convicted inside trader with extensive knowledge of the American financial system and government policies under Obama, deployed grantees from his Open Society Foundations1 to lobby for and acquire federal contracts for job training, green energy, and community redevelopment programs. By gaining control over those resources, Soros advanced his agenda for “green economics,” open borders, and increased government handouts. In short, he grew his empire, which includes much of the “progressive” movement in the U.S., as the federal government and Obama’s political constituencies grew in power and influence.
Anyone interested in learning more can read all about it here:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)