Thursday, December 6, 2012

Display of Nativity Scene is OK in Public Places



Court Rules Private Display of Nativity Scene is Allowed in Public Places

Warren, MI - A nativity scene that dates back to 1945 will be back up this year, after a 4-year absence. The federal court of appeals has deemed that the private display of a nativity scene on Mound Road’s median in Warren, Michigan, is constitutional and that the city’s refusal to allow the display violated the First Amendment.

In 2008 the Freedom from Religion Foundation sent a threatening letter to the Macomb County Road Commission. The Sataway family had displayed a nativity on the public median since 1945. In 2008, when the family applied for a permit for the nativity, the government denied the request because the nativity contains “a religious message.” The family filed suit, claiming the government violated their right to free speech. The court of appeals agreed.

Liberty Counsel offers pro bono counsel and litigation, if needed, to support a town’s right to display nativity scenes in public places.

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “Unfortunately some public officials mistakenly believe that censoring religious viewpoints from the public square is the safest approach, when, in fact, that violates the First Amendment.”

Liberty Counsel launched its tenth annual “Friend or Foe” Christmas Campaign to educate and, if necessary, litigate to make sure religious viewpoints are not censored during Christmas. Liberty Counsel provides information about Christmas at www.LC.org and a “Naughty & Nice” list, which overviews retailers that acknowledge Christmas and those that do not.

Finally A Judge that knows the constitution.
The Constitution guarantees EVERYONE freedom OF religion.
It does not guarantee ANYONE freedom FROM religion.
Most Atheists (and the ACLU) can’t seem to understand this.


WHAT HAPPENED TO FREEDOM OF REligion?



The Constitution guarantees EVERYONE freedom OF religion.
It does not guarantee ANYONE freedom FROM religion.
Atheists (and the ACLU) can’t seem to understand this.
Here are some recent examples.
 





Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Obama’s recess appointments



Court casts doubt on Obama’s recess appointments

A federal appeals court on Wednesday questioned not only President Obama's controversial January recess appointments but the entire system of such appointments, using oral arguments in a case to cast doubt on whether presidential powers can ever be exercised unless Congress has adjourned for good.

The case involves a challenge to Mr. Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in early January — during a time when the Senate was holding pro forma sessions every three days, specifically for the purposes of denying him the chance to make those appointments.


Read entire story in The Washington Times here;
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/5/court-questions-obama-recess-appointments/print/


Ever feel like you're being watched?



I'm not trying to make you paranoid or anything, bit if you're one of those naive people that think YOUR civil rights have never been violated by the federal government; you better thing again…



Did you ever get the feeling you were being watched?

And watched by the government?

There’s very good reason to feel that way, says a whistleblower from the National Security Agency who says everyone in the U.S. is under virtual surveillance by federal authorities.





In an interview with RT, William Binney, a former mathematician and code breaker at the NSA, says the FBI records the emails of nearly all Americans, including members of Congress, and warns that the government can use this information against anyone.

“The FBI has access to the data collected, which is basically the emails of virtually everybody in the country. And the FBI has access to it,” Binney said.

“All the congressional members are on the surveillance too, no one is excluded. They are all included. So, yes, this can happen to anyone. If they become a target for whatever reason – they are targeted by the government, the government can go in, or the FBI, or other agencies of the government, they can go into their database, pull all that data collected on them over the years, and we analyze it all. So, we have to actively analyze everything they’ve done for the last 10 years at least.”

Binney resigned from the agency in 2001, as he no longer wanted to be part of alleged violations of the U.S. Constitution.

He says information is being collected in bulk without even requesting providers.

“I don’t think they are filtering it. They are just storing it,” Binney told RT. “I think it’s just a matter of selecting when they want it. So, if they want to target you, they would take your attributes, go into that database and pull out all your data.”

When asked if he himself was on the target list, Binney responded, “Oh, sure! I believe I’ve been on it for quite a few years. So I keep telling them everything I think of them in my email. So that when they want to read it they’ll understand what I think of them.”

Binney actually blew the whistle on NSA practices during the term of President George W. Bush, but with President Barack Obama now in office, he says, “it’s getting worse. They are doing more. He is supporting the building of the Bluffdale facility, which is over two billion dollars they are spending on storage room for data. That means that they are collecting a lot more now and need more storage for it. That facility by my calculations that I submitted to the court for the Electronic Frontiers Foundation against NSA would hold on the order of 5 zettabytes of data. Just that current storage capacity is being advertised on the web that you can buy. And that’s not talking about what they have in the near future.”

Binney is a 2012 recipient of the Joe A. Callaway Award for Civic Courage, which is awarded to those who stand out for constitutional rights and American values at great risk to their personal or professional lives.

RT suggested his former colleagues at the NSA might view him as a traitor for exposing their practices.

When asked how he felt about them, he said: “They are violating the foundation of this entire country. Why this entire government was formed? It’s founded with the Constitution and the rights were given to the people in the country under that Constitution. They are in violation of that. And under executive order 13526, section 1.7 – you cannot classify information to just cover up a crime, which this is, and that was signed by President Obama. Also President Bush signed it earlier as an executive order, a very similar one. If any of this comes into Supreme Court and they rule it unconstitutional, then the entire house of cards of the government falls.”

He says the government is doing its best to try to keep the issue out of court.

“And, of course, we are trying to do the best we can to get into court. So, we decided it deserves a ruling from the Supreme Court. Ultimately the court is supposed to protect the Constitution. All these people in the government take an oath to defend the Constitution. And they are not living up to the oath of office.”

IMPEACH NOW



President Obama went on television and lied to the American people about the embassy attack in Benghazi while terrorists carried our ambassador through the streets as a trophy.  

Stevens and three other Americans are dead because “Commander in Chief” Obama—supposedly the protector of the American people—did absolutely nothing to help them.  He didn’t send support.  He didn’t call for reinforcements; he just watched the attack and (presumably) ordered the CIA to “stand down.”

Then, he lied about what happened to cover up his misdeed and tamp down the controversy before the election. He publicly stated that the impetus behind the violence was civilians protesting a film depicting the Muslim prophet Mohammed, but all along, he knew this wasn’t the truth. He and his administration knew that Al-Qaeda had orchestrated the attack; yet, they did nothing, and worse, we are discovering he not only is guilty of inaction, but making it clear no one was to help.

Obama was guilty as hell in the “fast and Furious” scandal.  Both he and Eric Holder should have been impeached then, but were allowed to get away with a cover-up.  How many impeachable offences will this Congress let him get away with?

There are many actions taken by President Obama that are clearly wrong, but are not quite impeachable offenses by law. However, in addition to fast and furious, and the Benghazi cover-up, he has committed many crimes against the United States of America and he must be held accountable.  For example;
  • When the DREAM Act didn’t pass Congress, Obama went around them and granted amnesty to illegal aliens anyway—and he is even suing states who are fighting for the right to enforce our laws!
  • After the New Black Panther Party clearly disenfranchised white voters in Pennsylvania, Obama instructed his Justice Department to drop the matter and ignore the crime.
  • Obama sent troops into Libya without Congressional approval, ignoring the War Powers Act of 1973—arguing that “international permission” was good enough.
  • In January, Obama made four Senate “recess” appointments without Senate approval—even though the Senate was, in fact, in pro forma session.
  • After passing Obamacare and forcing every American to have to purchase health insurance, Obama then begins forcing employers to provide abortion drugs and birth control pills in their healthcare plans.
  • He instructed the Office of Management and Budget to ignore the WARN Act and save thousands of pink slips until after the election, so it wouldn’t affect votes.
  • Does anyone in their right mind honestly believe he didn’t have anything to do with all those voting machines that voted for him when the voter was attempting to vote for Romney?  (and many other forms of election fraud)
In Federalist Paper 65, Alexander Hamilton says impeachable offenses are “offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words, from the violation or abuse of some public trust. They are of a nature which with peculiar propriety may be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done to society itself.”

Americans were murdered and Obama’s primary concern was about keeping his job. We must put pressure to Congress to impeach Obama and demand they look into criminal charges against any parties in the Executive branch that may have broken the law to cover up a terrorist attack, or even more serious, who refused help to Americans in a foreign country who were under attack. 

Write, call, or fax your Congressman.  We must stay on their backs like flies on a fresh turd until Obama is behind bars for his crimes against the American people and against the members of our brave embassy staff who posthumously cry out for justice.

Some of the things this President has done make Richard Nixon look like a Saint. This President has lied to the American people and ignored laws over and over and over and over just to get re-elected, now he has four more years to destroy our sovereignty, our national security, and our Constitution.

Obama believes he has a blank check upon which to write his lies and deceit and political games.  Stop his conspiracy against the United States.  Write that letter or send that fax to your Congressman today and demand the impeachment of the President IMMEDIATELY.

AND, Please watch this short video.







 

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Perfect Quote

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way that you can quickly understand them.  This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out.  It was translated into English from an article in the Prague newspaper Prager Zeitungon.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.  It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.  
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America.  Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.   
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool.  It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."