ISIS IS WAITING AT THE BORDER

IF YOU THINK WE DON’T NEED TO CONTROL OUR BORDERS, THINK AGAIN.

Shaykh Mahmood Omar Khabir actually brags in an Italian newspaper article that the border region is so open that he “could get in with a handful of men, and kill thousands of people in Texas or in Arizona in the space of a few hours.”

Judicial Watch confirmed reports that ISIS is operating in Mexico.
Judicial Watch reported, via Free Republic:

"ISIS operative Shaykh Mahmood Omar Khabir has reportedly been training militants near the US border near Ciudad Juarez for the past year."

But although we know where they are and that they are there SOLELY with the intent to murder as many Americans as they can possibly murder; we don't send our Special Forces down to take them out. Why?

Because Barack "the pathological and sociopathic liar" Obama has openly declared "the Islamic State is not Islamic"! And "the United States will never be at war with Islam." and "the sweetest sound I have EVER heard is the Muslim morning call to prayer". and because HE is Islam's greatest ally and is intentionally leaving that border vulnerable to the degree he can as the result of his declared "change" in America which essentially amounts to his own personal "jihad".

I know a low of people still don’t believe it, but the facts are the facts. Barack is a proven liar and is purposely destroying our country.  Obama is leaving the border open for a reason.   Ask yourself this; WHY are we allowing them to muster their despicable "army" of Jihadists at our border, knowing some have already come into the United States? WHY?  If you do not know why, then YOU are part of the problem.

This report was published in April, and things have only gotten worse since then:

http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/report-muslim-terrorists-sneak-into-u-s-with-help-of-drug-cartels/

HERE NOW FOR YOUR VIEWING PLEASURE: HILLARY VIDEOS.

HERE NOW FOR YOUR VIEWING PLEASURE.
A FEW OF THE MANY HILLARY VIDEOS.

Top 5 Reasons You CANNOT Vote Hillary Clinton…   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdMWpvvnk2Q

 

Compilation of CNN Cutting Guests Mics to Protect Hillary Clinton… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYRN8Clddw

Bob Beckel is calling for Assange’s death – based on the fact that Assange plans to broadcast the TRUTH about Hillary…

http://truthfeed.com/hillary-surroagte-bob-beckel-calls-for-assassination-of-julian-assange/16225/

Compilation of CNN Cutting Guests Mics to Protect Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYRN8Clddw

Trump Calls Out Media and Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Says He LOVES PROTESTERS at Ft. Worth Rally. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxo9b6PazkA

ALL VOTERS MUST WATCH THIS !! • HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT ??  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ojeiby_l7E

 

HILLARY AGAIN !! • FBI INVESTIGATING AGAIN !! • BREAKING NEWS !! • DCCC HACKED, DNC HACKED    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFyBhygsaNs

 

LEAKED VIDEO Of Hillary Clinton Shows Her On Camera Admitting To Email Corruption!     http://endingthefed.com/leaked-video-of-hillary-clinton-shows-her-on-camera-admitting-to-email-corruption.html

 

For all the misguided and totally insane flack Donald Trump is catching for his “second amendment people” comment, no one seems to be remembering that Hillary Clinton made a similar remark that was WAY more inflammatory back in 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd5_jRFdQ-I

 

Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal…   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY

 

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Manager Steps Forward! Explains 'Strategy'  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvY2kFfOHjo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What an evil and wicked web she weaves

No wonder Hillary is losing her mind. Who could possibly keep up with all the lies and the crimes?  I can't even begin to imagine how she manages to get away with it all. 

It must be because anyone who is anyone and can do something about it, is just as evil and corrupt as she is.  She knows it and that's why she's so confident nothing will happen.

Since the criminals around her will do nothing to bring her to justice, it has to be up to we the people NOT to vote for her and hope her use of voter fraud doesn't ensure her victory.  That's what Donald Trump meant by Second Amendment people stopping her: not by assassination as crooked Hillary claims to disparage Mr. Trump, but at the polls.

There are very dark and evil forces are behind the Clintons, which is why nobody will touch them.   Just look at what happened to the DNC staffer who was just murdered, the morning he was to meet with the FBI, and just why do you think FBI Director Comey backed away from recommending prosecution on a slam dunk case.  Don't think anything will come of the Clinton Slush Fund-ation investigation, because people know about the Clinton history, and do NOT want to be found dead with a pillow over their head… 

The bottom line is, everyone needs to understand there is no longer any integrity in Washington, and that is why it is so very important to elect a Washington outsider like Trump.  All of the Washington insiders are accumulating wealth by retaining the status quo.

With all my heart and soul, I hope Trump wins this election, and I hope he hires the best body guards money can buy, because he’s going to need them.

Here’s a new development:

http://conservativebrief.com/breaking-fbi-conducts-massive-raid-into-hillary-clinton-cohorts-office/

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2016/08/05/fbi-investigation-philadelphia/

 

The truth about Khizr Khan and Sharia Law

Khan defends Sharia law responsible for the executions of gays and women in 11 countries

Khizr Khan, the Muslim immigrant lawyer from Pakistan who arrived in America by way of Dubai and pulled at the heart strings of viewers of the Democratic National Convention by regaling the audience with the story of the loss of his son in Iraq, Army Captain Humayun Khan, told his son’s story but skipped over his own.

Khizr Khan entered the United States in 1980 from Dubai to attend Harvard Law School. 

Khan specializes in international trade law for Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. As anyone familiar with these countries knows, trade law for both countries involves the traditional Muslim bribe, the baksheesh, which, depending on the value of the deal, can involve millions of dollars. These deals are very familiar to Trump, who could have strengthened his argument against Khan by revealing the “Gold Star father’s” specialty in the “art of the bribe.”

Khan co-founded the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law, an academic periodical that seeks to defend the arcane Sharia law to a legal system based on Western jurisprudence. Of course, Sharia law justifies the execution of gays, prostitutes, blasphemers, and Muslim “apostates” who convert to other religions.

READ A LOT MORE HERE:  http://www.infowars.com/what-the-media-isnt-reporting-about-khizr-khan/

      

Three Times on the Brink.

Three times during my lifetime this great country of ours has found itself on the brink of total destruction and annihilation.

The first time was, of course World War Two.   

A lot of people, especially the younger generations, fail to realize just how close we came to losing.  German technology was way ahead of the rest of the world.  They had both operational jet aircraft and rocket aircraft, and they were working on nuclear technology.  The fact that we didn’t lose may have been just a few lucky events, or perhaps it was Gods will.  But if we and our allies had lost, I suspect about half of the world would have been ruled by Hitler, and the other half by the Emperor of Japan.

The second time didn’t get much publicity.   

Some people who read this may not even be aware of this.  It occurred in October of 1962 during the height of the Cuban missile crisis.  Everyone knows all about what went on with the naval blockade of Cuba and the B52 Bombers that were headed toward the Soviet Union with Nuclear bombs.  That was all well documented and publicized over the years.  But, it was what was going on underwater that poised the real threat.  If you are not familiar with the incident, you might want to read the following two links.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208342/Soviet-submariner-single-handedly-averted-WWIII-height-Cuban-Missile-Crisis.html

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB399/

This brings us to the third time, which I’m sorry to say is NOW:

Under President Obama, an ultra liberal federal government has seized more and more control over our lives. But things are going to make drastic changes as a result of the November election.  It will either be a drastic change for the worse if Hillary wins.  Or a drastic change for the better if Trump wins.

This year we have an unusual opportunity to control the course of history.  The course of history IS GOING TO CHANGE.  It is in our hands to determine the direction of that change.   It is OUR DUTY to defeat Hillary Clinton and the pro-late term abortion, pro-gender-confusion, anti-religious liberty, tax-and-spend, big government liberalism that she champions. 

Hillary Clinton will quickly stack the Supreme Court with ultra left wing extremists whose decisions will permanently change this country.  Hillary’s campaign was financed primarily by Muslim countries, which will have a big say in who she nominates for the court.  She will soon have a court which will favor Sharia Law.   She will quickly replace Justice Scalia with another liberal like Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.  This would give liberals a 5-4 majority on the Supreme Court even without Justice Kennedy, and 6-3 when he votes with them.

Also, Justice Ginsburg is 83 years old and she has had colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, and has a heart stint.  Justice Kennedy is 80, and Justice Breyer is 78.   Hillary could possibly nominate three or four justices to the Supreme Court, locking in a far-left activist judiciary for perhaps 30 or more years.  She could also add dozens of activist judges to federal district courts and courts of appeals, the courts where 99% of federal lawsuits are decided. Judicial tyranny of the type we have never seen before would be forced upon us.

The nation would no longer be ruled by the people and their elected representatives, but by unelected, unaccountable, activist judges who would dictate from the bench about whatever they were pleased to decree.  And there would be nothing in our system of government that anyone could do to stop them.

That is why this election is not just about Hillary Clinton.  It is about defeating the far left liberal agenda that any Democratic nominee would champion.  Liberal Democrats are now within one Supreme Court justice of their highest goal: gaining permanent control of the nation with a five vote majority on the Supreme Court, and then relentlessly imposing every liberal policy on the nation not through winning elections but through a relentless parade of one Supreme Court decision after another. 


Even if Clinton were to drop out of the race (perhaps due to additional shocking email disclosures, for example), our choice in the election would be just the same, because any other Democratic nominee would appoint the same kind of liberal justices to the Court. 

A liberal court would probably find the ban on partial-birth abortion to be unconstitutional (it was upheld by only a 5-4 majority in Gonzalez v. Carhart, 2007).
The current liberal agenda often includes suppressing Christian opposition to its views.  So a liberal court would increasingly nullify rights of conscience with respect to forced participation in same-sex marriage ceremonies or expressing moral objections to homosexual conduct.  Already Christians are being pushed out of many occupations.  Florists, bakers, and professional photographers have had their businesses destroyed by large fines for refusal to contribute their artistic talents to a specific event, a same-sex wedding ceremony to which they had moral objections.

Freedom of speech would be increasingly restricted in the public square.  In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that prayers of visiting pastors who prayed “in Jesus’ name” when they opened a city council meeting were allowed under the Constitution, but again it was a 5-4 decision (Town of Greece v. Galloway) and all four liberals who wanted to restrict such prayers are still on the court.


Another troubling possibility is that liberal activists, once in power, would further entrench themselves by criminalizing much political dissent.  We have already seen it happen with the IRS targeting of conservative groups and with some state attorneys general taking steps to prosecute (!) groups who dare to disagree with activists’ claims about the danger of man-made global warming.

Trump has released a list of 11 judges to show the kind of nominee he would appoint to the Supreme Court.  If he appoints a replacement for Scalia from his list of 11 , and probably one or two other Supreme Court justices, then we could see a 5-4 or even 6-3 majority of conservative justices on the Supreme Court.  The results for the nation would be overwhelmingly good.

Such a Supreme Court would finally return control of the nation to the people and their elected representatives, removing it from dictatorial judges who repeatedly make law from the bench. 
 
I believe that defeating Hillary’s kind of liberalism would be a morally right action.  “Whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin” (James 4:17).

Is Trump the Peace Candidate?

By Pat Buchanan   August 2, 2016, 6:00 am

With Democrats howling that Vladimir Putin hacked into and leaked those 19,000 DNC emails to help Trump, the Donald had a brainstorm: Maybe the Russians can retrieve Hillary Clinton’s lost emails.

Not funny, and close to “treasonous,” came the shocked cry.

Trump then told The New York Times that a Russian incursion into Estonia need not trigger a U.S. military response.

Even more shocking. By suggesting the U.S. might not honor its NATO commitment, under Article 5, to fight Russia for Estonia, our foreign policy elites declaimed, Trump has undermined the security architecture that has kept the peace for 65 years.

More interesting, however, was the reaction of Middle America. Or, to be more exact, the nonreaction. Americans seem neither shocked nor horrified. What does this suggest?

Behind the war guarantees America has issued to scores of nations in Europe, the Mideast and Asia since 1949, the bedrock of public support that existed during the Cold War has crumbled.

We got a hint of this in 2013. Barack Obama, claiming his “red line” against any use of poison gas in Syria had been crossed, found he had no public backing for air and missile strikes on the Assad regime.

The country rose up as one and told him to forget it. He did.

We have been at war since 2001. And as one looks on the ruins of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen, and adds up the thousands dead and wounded and trillions sunk and lost, can anyone say our War Party has served us well?

On bringing Estonia into NATO, no Cold War president would have dreamed of issuing so insane a war guarantee.

Eisenhower refused to intervene to save the Hungarian rebels. JFK refused to halt the building of the Berlin Wall. LBJ did nothing to impede the Warsaw Pact’s crushing of the Prague Spring. Reagan never considered moving militarily to halt the smashing of Solidarity.

Were all these presidents cringing isolationists?

Rather, they were realists who recognized that, though we prayed the captive nations would one day be free, we were not going to risk a world war, or a nuclear war, to achieve it. Period.

In 1991, President Bush told Ukrainians that any declaration of independence from Moscow would be an act of “suicidal nationalism.”

Today, Beltway hawks want to bring Ukraine into NATO. This would mean that America would go to war with Russia, if necessary, to preserve an independence Bush I regarded as “suicidal.”

Have we lost our minds?

The first NATO supreme commander, General Eisenhower, said that if U.S. troops were still in Europe in 10 years, NATO would be a failure. In 1961, he urged JFK to start pulling U.S. troops out, lest Europeans become military dependencies of the United States.

Was Ike not right? Even Barack Obama today riffs about the “free riders” on America’s defense.

Is it really so outrageous for Trump to ask how long the U.S. is to be responsible for defending rich Europeans who refuse to conscript the soldiers or pay the cost of their own defense, when Eisenhower was asking that same question 55 years ago?

In 1997, geostrategist George Kennan warned that moving NATO into Eastern Europe “would be the most fateful error of American policy in the post-Cold War era.” He predicted a fierce nationalistic Russian response.

Was Kennan not right? NATO and Russia are today building up forces in the eastern Baltic where no vital U.S. interests exist, and where we have never fought before — for that very reason.

There is no evidence Russia intends to march into Estonia, and no reason for her to do so. But if she did, how would NATO expel Russian troops without air and missile strikes that would devastate that tiny country?

And if we killed Russians inside Russia, are we confident Moscow would not resort to tactical atomic weapons to prevail? After all, Russia cannot back up any further. We are right in her face.

On this issue Trump seems to be speaking for the silent majority and certainly raising issues that need to be debated.

How long are we to be committed to go to war to defend the tiny Baltic republics against a Russia that could overrun them in 72 hours?

When, if ever, does our obligation end? If it is eternal, is not a clash with a revanchist and anti-American Russia inevitable?

Are U.S. war guarantees in the Baltic republics even credible?

If the Cold War generations of Americans were unwilling to go to war with a nuclear-armed Soviet Union over Hungary and Czechoslovakia, are the millennials ready to fight a war with Russia over Estonia?

Needed now is diplomacy.

The trade-off: Russia ensures the independence of the Baltic republics that she let go. And NATO gets out of Russia’s face.

Should Russia dishonor its commitment, economic sanctions are the answer, not another European war.

http://buchanan.org/blog/trump-peace-candidate-125499

Here is another recent post by Pat Buchanan which is closely related to this one:   http://buchanan.org/blog/war-party-targets-putin-and-assad-124140

I now see the reason for this unusually tactic by Democrats.

A Muslim man named Ghazala Khan, and his wife, both appeared on stage at the Democratic National Convention to attack, on Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s behalf, Donald Trump—the Republican nominee for president.  Their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, was killed in Iraq in 2004.   Khizr Khan, in his speech to the DNC, lambasted Donald Trump for wanting to temporarily halt Islamic migration to America from countries with a proven history of exporting terrorists.

I have been unable to understand this tactic from the get-go.  Trump had nothing to do with their son’s death; he was killed by Islamic extremists.  Trump wants to defeat these extremists.  We have recently seen proof (Hillary’s emails) that Obama and Hillary have been supporting these extremists.  It seems to me he is directing his blame on the wrong people.

I now see the reason for this unusually tactic.   It turns out that Khizr Khan, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm.  In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.

READ MORE HERE:  http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/

UPDATE:

http://politicalcult.com/blue-star-mom-responds-muslim-attack-brutal/