If Hillary Clinton were to achieve her dream of capturing the White House
in November, she would use her vast power to erase American liberty as we know
it.
Hillary’s
record in targeting the First and Second amendments—the two amendments that
inseparably protect all of our freedoms—sets her apart as the most anti-freedom
candidate to run for the White House.
Hillary
winning the Presidency would be just as bad as the Communist Party winning – Oh
wait; it would be the SAME thing because the Communist is backing her. The KKK is also backing her. All of the Islamic state countries are also
backing her, but of course they cannot legally vote, but they have contributed
hundreds of millions of dollars to her.Hillary
has openly said that the U.S. Supreme Court, which has twice affirmed the
individual right to keep and bear arms, “is wrong on the Second Amendment.”
With
the untimely, and very suspicious death of Justice Scalia, we have lost the
Strongest supporter of the First and second amendments. Hillary
has bragged about her plan to “take back the Second Amendment from these
extremists.”
“Take
back” a right guaranteed by our founders to every peaceable American? The
Second Amendment says, “the right of the people,” not the right of Hillary. And
there is nothing extreme about protecting American liberty—a cause we NRA
members embrace every day.
In a
key moment of a New Hampshire “town hall” campaign stop, Hillary was asked:
“Recently, Australia managed to get away, or take away tens of thousands,
millions of handguns. In one year, they were all gone. Can we do that?” Without hesitation, she said, “It’s worth
considering.” In Hillary’s world, “worth considering” means just doing it.
Hillary’s
obvious contempt for the Second Amendment and for Americans who fight to keep
that right intact is matched only by her disgust for the freedom of assembly
and free speech that are central to preserving liberty. She has pledged to rewrite the First Amendment to ban expenditures for purely
political speech—the heart of the grassroots effectiveness of the NRA.
She
fears the concept of the right of the people to assemble around political
ideals and constitutional principles. She fears the ability of individual
Americans to pool their funds to communicate those ideas. She loathes the
notion that constitutionally protected assemblies like the NRA can use free
speech to protect the rights of all Americans.
I hear
people saying that Hillary won’t have the power to amend the Constitution if
she’s elected, but with just one or two political appointees, she and other
anti-gun elites will own the U.S. Supreme Court. She does not need to amend the Constitution,
all she has to do is amend the way the Supreme Court interprets it.
As it
stands, the Second Amendment hangs by the balance of one seat on the high
court. In both Heller (which struck down the Washington, D.C., law prohibiting
handgun ownership and armed self-defense in the home) and McDonald (which
extended the right to keep and bear arms to the rest of the nation by striking
down Chicago’s gun ban), the court was split five-four.
But
over the next four years, there could likely be at least four vacancies on the
high court. If it’s a Hillary hand-picked court, our nation as we know it could
be sunk. She has remarked that she
thinks Obama would be an excellent choice for the Supreme Court.
Imagine
if Obama, or former Attorney General Eric Holder, or New York Gov. Andrew
Cuomo, or U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) or political operative John
Podesta as Supreme Court justices.
With a
Hillary-controlled Supreme Court, the Constitution will be shredded and our
liberty will be destroyed. Such a
Supreme Court would wipe out the separation of powers and render Congress
meaningless. Executive lawlessness would
rule the day.