Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Maybe it’s Time to abolish Both the EPA, and the DHS

The Department of Homeland Security May Seize Your Car
In another example of how the Department of Homeland Security has expanded far outside the purview of its original function, six vehicles full of DHS agents were required to seize a Land Rover from a couple in Statesville, N.C. due to the fact that the vehicle allegedly violates EPA emission standards.

As part of its mission to “protect the Homeland,” the DHS has been busy seizing imported vehicles that don’t comply with safety and CO2 regulations.
Read more at:

Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts.

Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Education Department.

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputization of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens' ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

A White House National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Kanye West Announces He’ll Leave The U.S.A. Because Of Racism

Kanye West Announces He’ll Leave The United States Because Of Racism

Yep, the United States is so racist that Kanye West was able to become a multi-multi millionaire here.

My opinion is, he is leaving The United States Because Of his own personal Racism.   He spews hate every time he opens his stupid mouth.

OBAMA SAID: Muslims Built 'The Very Fabric of Our Nation'

President Obama and First Lady Michelle released a statement thanking Muslim Americans for their many “achievements and contributions… to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”


How about thanking Christians and Jews for THEIR contributions to this country - you know, like FOUNDING it?  Ah, that's right...that would offend our Jihadist-in-Chief!



Wednesday, July 23, 2014


Border Patrol Agents: U.N. Taking Control of America’s Southern Border

Under the pretense of labeling illegals "refugees," U.N. personnel are working with DHS to ship MS-13 gang members into U.S., says agent


Laura Hollis is a University of Notre Dame graduate, and after an illustrious career at a couple of other Midwestern universities, she returned to her alma mater to teach entrepreneurship and business law.  She also writes an occasional column.  This is one of her latest, about the Affordable Care Act, which has gone viral via the Internet.  Her thoughts are challenging, regardless of one's political persuasion.



The unveiling of the dictatorial debacle that is Obamacare absolutely flabbergasts me. It is stunning on so many levels, but the most shocking aspect of it for me is watching millions of free Americans stand idly by while this man, his minions in Congress and his cheerleaders in the press systematically dismantle our Constitution, steal our  freedoms.

The President, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid (with no small help from Justice John Roberts) take away our health care, and we allow it. They take away our insurance, and we allow it. They take away our doctors, and we allow it. They charge us thousands of dollars more a year, and we allow it. They make legal products illegal, and we allow it. They cripple our businesses, and we allow it. They announce by fiat that we must ignore our most deeply held beliefs - and we allow it.

Where is your spine,

Yes, I know people are complaining. I read the news on the internet. I read blogs. I have a Twitter feed. So what? People in the
Soviet Union complained. People in Cuba complain. People in China complain (quietly). Complaining isn't the same thing as doing anything about it. In fact, much of the complaining that we hear sounds like resignation: Wow. This sucks. Oh well, this is the way things are. Too bad.

Perhaps you need reminding of a few important facts. Here goes:

1.. The President is not a king. Barack Obama does not behave like a President, an elected official, someone who realizes that he works for us. He behaves like a king, a dictator - someone who believes that his own pronouncements have the force of law, and who thinks he can dispense with the law's enforcement when he deigns to do so. And those of us who object? How dare we? Racists!

And while he moves steadily "forward" with his plans to "fundamentally transform" the greatest country in human history, he distracts people with cheap, meaningless trivialities, like "free birth control pills"! (In fact, let's face it: this administration's odd obsession with sex in general -- Birth control! Abortion! Sterilization! Gay guys who play basketball! -- is just plain weird. Since when did the leader of the free world care so much about how people have sex, who they have it with, and what meds they use when they have it? Does he have nothing more important to concern himself with?)

2.. It isn't just a failed software program; it is a failed philosophy. People are marveling that <> was such a spectacular failure. Well, if one is only interested in it as a product launch, I've explained some of the reasons for that here <> . But the larger point is that it isn't a software failure, or even a product failure; it is a philosophy failure.

I have said this before: Obama is not a centrist; he is a central planner. And this - all of it: the disastrous computer program, the hundreds of millions of dollars wasted, the lies, the manipulation of public opinion, the theft of the public's money and property, and freedom (read insurance, and premiums, and doctors) -- IS what central planning looks like.

The central premise of central planning is that a handful of wunderkinds with your best interests at heart (yeah, right) know better than you what's good for you. The failure of such a premise and the misery it causes have been clear from the dawn of humanity. Kings and congressmen, dictators and Dear Leaders, potentates, princes and presidents can all fall prey to the same imperial impulses: "we know what is good for 'the people'." And they are always wrong.

There is a reason that the only times communism has really been tried have been after wars, revolutions, or coups d'├ętat. You have to have complete chaos for people to be willing to accept the garbage that centralized planning produces. Take the
Soviet Union, for example. After two wars, famine, and the collapse of the Romanov dynasty, why wouldn't people wait in line for hours to buy size 10 shoes? Or settle for the gray matter that passed for meat in the grocery stores? But communism's watered-down cousin, socialism, isn't much better. Ask the Venezuelans who cannot get toilet paper. Toilet paper! ¡Viva la Revoluci├│n!

Contrary to what so many who believe in a "living Constitution" say, the Founding Fathers absolutely understood this. That is why the Constitution was set up to limit government power. (Memo to the President: the drafters of the Constitution deliberately didn't say "what government had to do on your behalf.  They understood that that was the path to folly, fear, and famine.)

3.. Obama is deceitful. Just as the collapse of the computer program should not surprise anyone, neither should we be shocked that the President lied about his healthcare plan. Have any of you been paying attention over the past few years? Obama has made no secret of his motivations or his methods. The philosophies which inspire him espouse deceit and other vicious tactics. (Don't take my word for it: read Saul Alinsky.) Obama infamously
told reporter Richard Wolffe <> , "You know, I actually believe my own bullshit." He has refused to be forthcoming about his past (where are his academic records?). His own pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, told author Ed Klein <> , that Obama said to him, "You know what your problem is? You have to tell the truth." Did Obama lie when he said dozens of times, "If you like your plan, you can keep it. Period!"? Of course he did. That's what he does.

4.. The news media is responsible. Had the media been doing their jobs, we would have known a lot of this much, much earlier. The press is charged with the sacred responsibility of protecting the people from the excesses of government. Our press has been complicit, incompetent, or corrupt. Had they vetted this man in 2008, as they would have another candidate, we would have known far more about him than we do, even now. Had they pressed for more details about Obamacare, Congress' feet would have been held to the fire. Had they done their jobs about Eric Holder, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the
IRS scandal, NSA spying -- or any of the other myriad betrayals of the public trust that this administration has committed, Obama would likely have lost his 2012 reelection campaign. (A fact that even The Washington Post <> has tacitly acknowledged. Well done, fellas!)

Instead, they turned a blind eye, even when they knew he was lying, abusing power, disregarding the limits of the Constitution. It was only when he began to spy on them, and when the lies were so blatant that the lowest of low-information voters could figure it out, that they realized they had to report on it. (Yet even in the face of blatant, deliberate and repeated lies, The New York Times has the audacity to tell us that the President "misspoke
<> .") They have betrayed us, abandoned us, and deceived us.

5.. Ted Cruz was right. So was Sarah Palin. The computer program is a disaster. The insurance exchanges are a disaster. What's left? The healthcare system itself. And this, of necessity, will be a
disaster <> , too. Millions of people already have lost their individual insurance plans. In 2015, millions more will lose their employer-provided coverage (a fact which the Obama administration also knew, and admitted elsewhere). The exorbitant additional costs that Obamacare has foisted on unsuspecting Americans are all part of a plan of wealth confiscation and redistribution. That is bad enough. But it will not end there. When the numbers of people finally enter into the system and the corresponding demand for care vastly exceeds the cost projections (and they will, make no mistake), then the rationing will start. Not only choice at that point, but quality and care itself will go down the tubes. And then will come the decisions made by the Independent Payment Advisory Board about what care will be covered (read "paid for") and what will not.

That's just a death panel, put politely. In fact, progressives are already greasing the wheels for acceptance of that miserable reality as well. They're spreading the lie that it will be about the ability of the dying to refuse unwanted or unhelpful care. Don't fall for that one, either. It will be about the deaths that inevitably result from decisions made by people other than the patients, their families, and their physicians. (Perhaps it's helpful to think of their assurances this way: "If you like your end-of-life care, you can keep your end-of-life-care.")

6.. We are not SUBJECTS. We have tolerated these incursions into our lives and livelihoods too long already. There is no end to the insatiable demand "progressives" have to remake us in their image. Today it is our insurance, our businesses, our doctors, our health care.. Tomorrow some new crusade will be announced that enables them to take over other aspects of our formerly free lives.

I will say it again: WE
ARE NOT SUBJECTS. Not only is the Tea Party right on the fiscal issues, but it appears that they are more relevant than ever. We fought a war once to prove we did not want to be the subjects of a king. The Boston Tea Party was just a taste of the larger conflict to come. If some people missed that lesson in history class, we can give them a refresher.

The 2014 elections are a good place to start. Call your representative, your senator, your candidate and tell them: "We are not subjects. You work for us. And if the word "REPEAL" isn't front and center in your campaign, we won't vote for you. Period!"            

"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government"

George Washington

"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors"

Lois Lerner needs to go to jail

Continued Corruption: Lerner’s ‘Missing’ Hard Drive was Recoverable

The House Ways and Means Committee has had enough excuses from those seeking to protect the IRS from the fallout surrounding the IRS scandal. The committee learned on Tuesday that the hard drive containing the so-called “lost” emails from Lois Lerner’s office was “scratched,” but very much recoverable, despite earlier assertions by government IT specialists.

In the law, there is a thing called "spoliation of evidence" which basically says when a litigant has destroyed relevant evidence which is sought by the other side, the fact finder may infer that the evidence would have been adverse to the position of the one who destroyed it.   This makes sense, because there would be no rational motive for someone to destroy evidence that would prove their innocence in the court of law and the court of public opinion.

The IRS's failure to produce Lois Lerner's emails implies much more than a mere coincidence or accident, and it is reasonable to conclude that those emails contained damning evidence.  If, as President Obama and his proxies continue to insist, this whole thing is a "phony scandal" and a GOP witch hunt, you can be certain that Lerner's emails records would have been made public months ago.   Lerner, for her part, has offered no explanation for what happened aside from asserting her innocence moments before invoking her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent in order to avoid self-incrimination.  

Tuesday, July 22, 2014


Obama vs. Romney on Russia

See 45 second Video Here:


It’s time to start putting some IRS employees in jail…

IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 hard drives

Loss of Lois Lerner emails amid tea party targeting probe unresolved

I think it’s time to start putting some IRS employees in jail…

Monday, July 21, 2014

Ted Nugent Sends Letter to Obama, Senate and Congress

Amazing Letter form Ted Nugent to Obama, Senate and Congress

Our founding Fathers would consider Edward Snowden a National Hero.

Whistle-blower Edward Snowden explains the patterns of behavior he would routinely witness at the NSA that led him to believe the actions taken by the agency were a violation of citizens’ rights.

With the ability to capture every American citizen's e-mail, the NSA could scoop your private pictures up if they were sent as an attachment to a PRIVATE e-mail, never being meant to be seen by anyone more than the sender or receiver! 

They also have the ability to turn on that little camera on the front of your laptop.  (Mine has a piece of tape covering it)  However, they can still turn on the computer microphone and monitor everything that goes on in your house.

Even some of the new TVs have internet connection and built in cameras which they can turn on.  The bottom line is, there may be former or current NSA employees out there who have nude photos of you or of some of your family members.

I believe that our founding Fathers would consider Edward Snowden a National Hero.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Dictator Obama Banned the AK-47 with Executive Order.

This has nothing to do with Russia.   It’s all about gun control in the US.
If it was about Russia why didn’t he ban Russian Vodka, Caviar and everything else made in Russia sold in the US?
Democrats have been after the AK for years, I’m surprised it took him this long.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

I DO Care about the Children, but…

The only thing worse than the United Nations is when the U.N. tries to control the United States.  
Our constitution couldn’t be clearer that international law, unless ratified by the Senate, has no power on United States soil… That pesky document doesn’t matter to the liberals pushing a globalist agenda. 

We saw it last year with the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, an attempt to control the international arms trade and limit civilians’ access to firearms for self defense. 

Obama and the Democrats tried hard to implement the U.N. Arms Treaty, and even though Barack Obama instructed John Kerry to sign the treaty, it has a zero percent chance being ratified in the Senate. 

But the fact that the United Nations and other globalists have attempted to push gun control on the American people should be enough to give you pause. 

Well, the United Nations is back.  Yet, instead of telling citizens what firearms they can and cannot possess, this time the U.N. Is fighting to have the illegal aliens rushing the border officially reclassified as refugees! 

These unaccompanied illegal alien teenagers are taking advantage of the system.  They come carrying a script and know just the trigger words to qualify for asylum. They say they are abused or that they come from a violent community, but none of this is true! 

If someone sneaks into this country, violating the law in the hopes they can receive benefits that they haven’t earned... I don’t care what the U.N. calls them. These people are criminals. 

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, or UNHRC, is pursuing the possibility of extending U.N. protection to the thousands of Central Americans crossing the U.S. border with them as “refugees” who are seeking asylum from political and domestic violence in their home countries.
Here we have people who are literally invading our country. This invasion of illegal aliens makes the D-Day invasion look miniscule. 

And instead of respecting our sovereignty, the United Nations is working to reclassify these illegals as “refugees” so that we would be forced to take care of them under international law! 

The United Nations admits that these illegals aren’t part of any group that the U.N. has officially classified as a vulnerable population.  These illegal immigrants aren’t fleeing religious or political persecution, either.  They simply didn’t like the country they were living in, so they decided to violate our laws and come here. Based on every definition, these people are NOT refugees. 

However, at a recent UNHRC meeting, representatives from various Central and South American countries concluded that Central American illegal aliens are “refugees” deserving of protection under international law. 

We are getting hit from all sides! We have a President and Congress that, for some ridiculous reason, actually want the United States to be overrun by illegals. And when a few brave politicians push to deport these illegals and send them back, the United Nations steps in to reclassify them as refugees!

First, the United Nations came for our guns.  Then, they made a push to try to control “global warming” (despite the fact that the earth is actually cooling).  Now, the U.N. has stepped in to reclassify these illegal aliens as refugees to stop us from deporting them! 

Why aren't they seeking asylum in Mexico?  Why is it the problem of the United States?  Did you know that Mexico is helping them cross their country to our border so that they don't have to deal with them?  And if the International community wants these kids classified as refugees, even though they do not fit the requirements, then let the international community take care of them.  Send their planes and boats and we will send them where they are wanted and can be taken care of, because it isn't here.

Because right now our society can't take care of our own children, or homeless or elderly or disabled.  Over 600,000 children in our country are in the system and will likely never be adopted or have a home.  40% of children in this country live below the poverty line.  The stats for the elderly and disabled are higher.



You have GOT to be kidding me

White House says ‘We've Substantially Improved the Tranquility of the Global Community’

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday the Obama administration’s foreign policies in a number of areas have enhanced the world’s “tranquility” – a word that raised eyebrows as reporters pointed to situations in Gaza, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Ukraine and the South China Sea.

For more laughs read here:


You have GOT to be kidding me, does this look like “tranquility”?



If the world is "tranquil" by the White House definition, then that explains why they're not doing anything about the "tranquility" in Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore... the southern border.

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Two Videos Every American Should Watch

Actor Jon Voight Speaks Out Against the New Democratic Party and National/Global Insecurity

You really should watch this video where Jon Voight reviews some of the predictions he made years ago about President Obama and what would happen under Obama’s leadership.   Now here we are and as unlikely as it may have seemed when Jon Voight first warned about what would happen, just about everything he predicted has and is happening almost exactly as he predicted.
Watch the video Here:


Also, here is Judge Jeanine Speaking about how Obama is Shipping Illegals to Your Town ‘Under the Cover of Darkness’

Watch it Here:

Obama created this national disorder to lead to a national security issue so he can direct his version of "POLICE STATE" and rule this country by executive order, which is already in place to do exactly that.  This is just a means speed up the process to the ultimate end.

The Impeachment of Barack Obama

John Boehner: “We have a system of government outlined in our Constitution” But I won’t follow it Concerning Impeachment of Barack Obama

Senate Democrats Vote to Change 1st Amendment!

The First Amendment is one of the pillars of our great republic.
Without the right to speak freely, publicly assemble, and practice religion, the United States simply wouldn’t exist.  Without this right, the United States would be completely different.
In recent years, the Supreme Court has slapped down campaign finance laws and Federal Elections Commission regulations because they place an undue burden on individuals’ first amendment rights. 

The first amendment doesn’t just protect your right to stand on a soapbox.   Free “speech” protects more than just your right to open your mouth and talk. “Speech” includes a number of different mechanisms and mediums to express individual beliefs and opinions. 

The Democrats absolutely hate your first amendment rights.  How else do you explain the fact that on this past Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10-8 to approve S.J. Res. 19, the “Money Out/Voters In” amendment?  This resolution would radically redefine the first amendment and alter our constitution! 

That’s right; the Democrats in the Judiciary Committee approved an amendment to the constitution that would exclude speech that costs money from the constitution’s protections.  This amendment would even give Congress the authority to ban books.  You didn’t see this on any of the news stations, but we are now one vote away from completely losing the first amendment to the Constitution! 

This proposed amendment will now go to the floor for a vote.  With forty-five co-sponsors, it is dangerously close to becoming a part of our constitution. 

The Obama administration is on a crusade to silence the conservative movement.  First, Obama’s IRS targeted Conservative non-profit groups to stop them from participating in the election.  Now, Democrats in the Senate are trying to get rid of your first amendment rights! 

This isn’t a joke!  The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the proposed amendment and now the FULL SENATE is going to vote on whether to absolutely gut the first amendment. 

Whether it is Diane Feinstein trying to pick and choose which “qualified journalists” are afforded constitutional protections or now the Senate Judiciary committee trying to restrict free speech, the war over the first amendment has come to your doorstep! 

Democrats will incrementally eliminate our rights little by little until they have what they want.  And it is now obvious that a dictatorship is what they want.  If you believe you would be content living in a dictatorship, then just ignore this email and go back to watching reruns of pawn stars or whatever.  

On the other hand, if you would like to keep what freedoms you still have, I suggest you call, fax, or email your senators and congressman and express your opinion. 


No matter which side you are on in this matter, this is funny.
Here is an email sent to Clarence Page of the
Chicago Tribune after an article he published concerning a name change for the Washington Redskins. 
Dear Mr. Page... 
I always love your articles, and I generally agree with them.  I would suggest, as in an email I received, they change the name to the "Foreskins" to better represent their community, paying tribute to the dick heads in Congress. 
I agree with our Native American population. I am highly insulted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins. One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward. 
Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the
Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians.  If your shorts are in a wad because of the reference the name Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to   get rid of the Cleveland Browns. 
The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of militant Blacks from the 60's alive.   It's offensive to us white folk.   
The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a team named for the Confederacy?  No!  There is no room for any reference to that tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives. 
I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names.  Totally inappropriate to have the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres. 
Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and pillaged. We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the Minnesota Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates! 
Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message to our children.  The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits.   Wrong message to our children. 
The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a growing childhood epidemic.  Wrong message to our children. 
The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates.  Wrong message to our children. 
Milwaukee Brewers.  Well that goes without saying.  Wrong message to our children. 
So, there you go.  We need to support any legislation that comes out to rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become involved with this issue, as they should.  Just the kind of thing the do-nothing Congress loves . . . 
As a diehard
Oregon State fan, my wife and I, with all of this in mind, suggest it might also make some sense to change the name of the Oregon State women's athletic teams to something other than "the Beavers."

Saturday, July 12, 2014

The Obama Dictatorship Must be Stopped NOW.

The EPA Now Claims the Power to “Garnish Wages” Without a Court Order.

President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency has been unleashed and spurred on by their almost cult-like belief in global warming and big government.

The EPA has absolutely no right to garnish the wages of individuals without a court order, properly adjudicated by a judge.  This rule would allow the EPA to arbitrarily accuse individuals of “crimes” against the environment, levying ridiculous fines, then garnishing the person’s wages if they challenge the fines or refuse to pay.



Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts.

Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Education Department.

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputization of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens' ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

A White House National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment.


Homeland Security, Feds Swarm Small Town in Bizarre Unannounced Show of Force

School field besieged by Black Hawk chopper, SWAT vehicles
Homeland Security agents, backed by police SWAT teams, armored vehicles and a Black Hawk helicopter staged a bizarre unannounced show of force in front of a school in a small Illinois town, scenes which will exacerbate concerns about the increasing militarization of U.S. law enforcement.
Our country is under a growing siege with Obama leading it.   So many things are going on in the country and they all point to get-used-to-it terrorism on an ever increasing scale. 
Simply by taking people by surprise wherever and whenever they want.   SWAT teams practicing on random families.   Increasing little by little and growing until he has everyone fighting in the streets enough to call out Martial Law.

Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts.

Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Education Department.

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputization of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens' ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

A White House National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment.