Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Supreme Court to decide 6 Major Cases in 2016

Supreme Court to decide politically charged cases in 2016

In several cases, conservatives are hoping the high court will shift current law to the right or block President Barack Obama’s policies, while liberals are defending the status quo.
But with justices closely split along ideological lines, the cases are likely to yield a series of 5-4 decisions and make clear the next president’s appointees could tip the law sharply to the right or left.
Here are the major cases due for decision by June 2016.

Abortion: The court will decide whether Texas can enforce two regulations that would force about three-fourths of the state’s abortion clinics to shut down.

Affirmative action: The court’s conservatives believe the Constitution and the civil rights laws forbid schools and colleges from admitting students based on their race, and they would like to strike down affirmative action policies that favor some applicants over others based on their race or ethnicity.

Union fees: The justices will hear a free-speech challenge to pro-union laws in more than 20 states that require all public employees pay a “fair share fee” to their union, even if they are opposed to the union and refuse to join.

Voting districts: Voters elect representatives to Congress, state legislatures and city councils in districts that are drawn to represent equal numbers of people. But that could change.   The court is considering an appeal from Texas that argues these districts should represent roughly equal numbers of eligible voters, rather than using the current system, which counts all people, including children, immigrants and prisoners.

Contraceptives: The court will decide its fourth case on Obama’s healthcare law, and the second involving a religious-freedom challenge to a regulation that requires employers to include no-cost coverage for contraceptives in their health insurance policies.

Immigration: Obama’s lawyers are appealing rulings by a judge in Texas and the 5th Circuit Court in New Orleans, which blocked Obama’s latest immigration action from taking effect.

We only have two true Conservatives on the Court, and four hard core left wing extremists.  So I’m not getting my hopes up too high.

Monday, December 28, 2015

Russia says USA is Protecting ISIS

Russian Defense Ministry accuses Pentagon of imitating fight against Islamic State.
Russian Defense Ministry spokesman thus commented regarding the recent statement by the Pentagon spokesperson who confirmed that the US didn't intend to share the information on IS targets with Moscow


Yeah Well, Obama's a Muslim so what did you expect...


Tuesday, December 22, 2015

NASA now says "burning fossil fuels causes cooling, NOT warming.

Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA

BURNING fossil fuels and cutting down trees causes global COOLING, NOT global WARMING.

In my opinion, the burning of fossil fuels causes neither global warming nor cooling… The changes in the SUN cause MOST of the changes in the climate… But what do I know? 

Back years ago they said it caused cooling, then they changed their mind and said it called warming.  Now they are back to cooling.  Stay tuned because eventually they will change back to warming.

Friday, December 18, 2015

The REAL Reason Why Turkey Shot Down Russian Fighter

The REAL Reason Why Turkey Shot Down Russian Fighter Jet! 



The GOP is Dying a Slow Death

I Sincerely Believe the Time may be near for all TRUE Conservatives to Leave the Republican Party.
The ONLY reason I don’t leave now is because in Oklahoma, as in some other states, you can only vote in the Primary elections of the party in which you are registered. 
The Republican Party is no longer a Conservative party.  It is only SLIGHTLY less Socialist/Communist that the Democratic Party.  Just take a look at the recent accomplishments of the so-called Conservative GOP.

And, if you didn’t read it, below is my blog post from a week ago.    

The new speaker’s first big deal is just like all of the ones that infuriated conservatives under Boehner.

If all the true conservative leave the GOP, and all the Left wing extremists stay in the Democratic Party, the rinos will simple whither and die on the vine.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

I'm Warning you - Pay Attention and get Involved.

Do you Remember this Story about Dozens of propane tanks stolen from three different Missouri locations?

WELL, here is an update, this time it’s Florida:

If you have not read this post from last week, you really should.

Paul Ryan is Driving more and more Voters to Trump.

The Paul Ryan Compromise

The new speaker’s first big deal is just like all of the ones that infuriated conservatives under Boehner.

When Paul Ryan was handed the speaker’s gavel in late October, he pledged to restore normal order to the People’s House and eliminate the sort of backroom deals that rank-and-file members complain are shoved down their throats at the 11th hour. So, late Tuesday night, Ryan unveiled a few thousand pages of consequential tax, spending, and regulatory legislation costing roughly $2 trillion and gave Congress and the public two whole days to review everything.

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Muslims took over an entire city council in Michigan.

First Muslim Council in U.S. Forces Locals to Obey Sharia Law
For the first time in U.S. history, a group of Muslims took over an entire city council.  They won, through legal election, a majority on the seats to the city council, and they have made it clear that non-Muslims need to be on the lookout.

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Cruz has surged ahead to become the latest front-runner in the Iowa caucuses

Cruz Soars to Front of the Pack in Iowa Poll.

Trump Support Stays Flat

Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz has surged ahead to become the latest front-runner in the campaign for the Iowa caucuses, dislodging Ben Carson and opening an impressive lead over a stalled Donald Trump, a Bloomberg Politics/Des Moines Register Iowa Poll shows.

The firebrand junior senator from Texas is backed by 31 percent of those likely to attend the Republican caucuses that start the presidential nomination season on Feb. 1. Trump is a distant second at 21 percent, up slightly from 19 percent in October, but below his peak of 23 percent in August.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

ACLU Board Member Urges People to Kill

ACLU Board Member Urges People to Kill Supporters of Donald Trump

I’m not surprised at anything Liberals do anymore.  They seem to have the attitude that "if you don't do what we say, then we will persecute you, force you out of universities, fire you from leadership roles in high-profile companies, and label you as Nazis."  But isn’t soliciting for someone to commit murder still a crime?

This isn’t about if you like Trump, or if you hate him.  This is about soliciting for someone to commit murder.   I bet if they said that about Obama supporters, Obama's Attorney General would prosecute...


The reason for all of Trump’s popularity in the polls is; he is the only one who is really expressing a sense of urgency.  Wake up people we are at war, and we are being flooded with an influx of foreigners, most of whom are not on our side in this war.

We must immediately, at the very least take the following action: Completely reform the vetting process for immigrants and foreign visitors. Change the screening process.  Come up with a new visa-application review process.  Stop this nonsense of marriage-visa fraud.  And, most important of all, we must immediately seal the borders.  

Fortunately, the Republican House voted to tighten restrictions on travel to the
U.S. by citizens of 38 nations who presently enter our country without a visa. This covers 20 million visitors a year who are allowed to stay 90 days. That is at least a start, but of course this system is abused, big time.

We absolutely MUST seal the borders.  People hoping to relocate to the U.S. from Syria, Iraq, and anywhere in the Middle East, and people coming here from France, England, Sweden, and wherever will be upset, at least for a while. There may be some unfairness to this. But I don’t care.  The Constitution protects freedom of religion for U.S. citizens.  But citizens of foreign lands have no constitutional right to migrate.  And federal law gives a president broad powers in deciding who comes and who does not, especially in wartime.

We are at war, and wars breed unfairness, just as they breed collateral damage. We may set back tourism, but how much tourism do you think existed in the world during WW2?   We need to shift to a wartime footing if we are going to protect the American homeland.

President Obama doesn’t get it, and he never will.  He has had ample opportunity, but he is not a wartime commander in chief. In fact, he is not a commander in chief at all.   Our Military leaders have said that if the U.S. wants to destroy ISIS, it can destroy ISIS.   We won’t be able to end terrorism around the world, but we can destroy ISIS in Syria and Iraq.     So let’s do it.

Let me emphasize that my support for wartime immigration restrictions is not based solely on religion, but there is no denying it is a factor.  Having said that, I think Trump is absolutely right.   We do need to temporally halt all Muslim immigration to this country, even if there is no apparent connection to ISIS.  We also need to have a permanent limitation on the number of Muslims coming to this country annually.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Shariah teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Shariah encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Shariah advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the
Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in the
Middle East.  

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in
Canada, Australia, the United States and Britain to elect the heads of Government by themselves!  Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have almost taken over several towns in the USA, Dearborn Mich. is one, and there are others. Britain has several cities now with Sharia Law controlled zones, totally controlled by Muslims.  

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.  Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.   The peaceful Muslims support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While Canada, Australia, the United States, and Britain are getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of their children, the Muslims are planning a great jihad on North America, Australia and Britain...


Friday, December 11, 2015

President Can Ignore Unconstitutional Supreme Court Decisions

Ted Cruz Said: The President Can Ignore Unconstitutional Supreme Court Decisions

Cruz said “I agree with President Lincoln and courts do not make law…The court interprets the law, applies the law…. And, you know, this is an area of really striking divide in this presidential election.…They’re [sic] quite a few Republicans who, when the gay “marriage” decision came down, they described it as the settled law of the land.  It’s final; we must accept it, move on and surrender.”

Those are almost word for word Barack Obama’s talking points and I think they are profoundly wrong. I think the decision was fundamentally illegitimate. It was lawless. It was not based on the Constitution.  I agree very much with Justice Scalia, who wrote a powerful dissent saying, this decision is a fundamental threat to our democracy.… And indeed, Justice Scalia, in the penultimate paragraph of his dissent, predicts, harkening back to President Lincoln defying Dred Scott, that state and local officials will refuse to obey this lawless decision.  It is remarkable to see a Supreme Court justice saying that would be the consequence of this.”

And, I would add the following:

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by
legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the
land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any
statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both
the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must
prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though
having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly
void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality
dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of
the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal
contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such
a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it
would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles
follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no
office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no
protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An
unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid
law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law
of the land, it is superseded thereby.

No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are
bound to enforce it.

It is that simple.   And, if in the OPINION of the "court", some "legislation" breaches the Constitution, then the "court" MUST petition Congress to make what ever "laws" are necessary and prudent - the "courts" are FORBIDDEN the "making of law" ... which includes the "un-making of law" as well.

In the end, WE THE PEOPLE are suppose to be the "final arbiters" of "Law".

Any laws that are opposite of the constitution are null and void period. The leadership in DC is guilty of treason, sedition. Subversion. Espionage. Malfeasance. Seditious conspiracy. Usurpation and several other laws.

Under federal law, 18 USC 242, it is illegal for anyone under the color of law to deprive any person of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the U.S. Constitution, and under 18 USC 241 it is illegal to conspire to violate such rights. It is a f
elony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. This could be applied to local, state, or federal law enforcement or military personnel who abuse the rights of citizens. Every state has a similar law.

The key point is this: You not only have the right to disobey an illegal order, but you may also have the duty to apprehend the parties issuing such an order if such issuance is part of the commission of a crime.

Trump is Right; Democrats and Rinos are Wrong...As Usual.

The Constitution protects freedom of religion for U.S. citizens.  But citizens of foreign lands have no constitutional right to migrate.  And federal law gives a president broad powers in deciding who comes and who does not, especially in wartime.

In 1924, Congress restricted immigration from
Asia, reduced the numbers coming from southern and Central Europe, and produced a 40-year moratorium on most immigration into the United States.

Its authors and President Coolidge wanted ours to remain a nation whose primary religious and ethnic ties were to
Europe, not Africa or Asia.

Under FDR, Truman and JFK, this was the law of the land.

My source for the above is Pat Buchanan’s recent column, which you can read here:

ISIS May be Printing their own Passports

ISIS May Have Passport Printing Machine, and Blank Passports

With the U.S. and other countries on high alert for ISIS attacks, American authorities are warning the terror group’s followers may have infiltrated American borders with authentic-looking passports ISIS has printed itself with its own machines, according to an intelligence report obtained by ABC News. 

The 17-page Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Intelligence Report, issued to law enforcement last week, says ISIS likely has been able to print legitimate-looking Syrian passports since taking over the city of Deir ez-Zour last summer, home to a passport office with “boxes of blank passports” and a passport printing machine. Another passport office was located in Raqqa, Syria, which has long been ISIS’s de facto capital.

Yeah well, Obama may have his own Birth Certificate Printing Machine.

Ben Carson threatens to leave the Republican Party

Ben Carson blasts RNC, threatens to leave Republican Party

'I will not sit by and watch a theft,' he says.
Ben Carson on Friday blasted the Republican National Committee following a Washington Post report that nearly two-dozen establishment party figures were prepping for a potential brokered convention as Donald Trump continues to lead most polls.


Thursday, December 10, 2015

Scalia Stirs Furor Suggesting Blacks Do Better in 'Slower-Track' Schools

Justice Scalia Stirs Furor Suggesting Blacks Do Better in 'Slower-Track' Schools

Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court’s most blunt justice, grabbed the spotlight during Wednesday’s debate over college affirmative action programs when he said that perhaps the University of Texas "ought to have fewer" racial minorities. 

“One of the briefs pointed out that most of the black scientists in this country don’t come from schools like the University of Texas,” Scalia said. “They come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they’re being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them.”

Scalia has always been outspoken despite all the criticism thrown his way. He is the only one on the Supreme Court who has routinely spoken out against the many controversial issues facing our country. 

He is sort of the "Donald Trump" of the Supreme Court.  He and Justice Clarence Thomas are by far the two best, and most conservative on the Supreme Court.

Morale in the military has “plummeted” in recent years because of Obama

Obama ‘More Interested in Promoting Homosexuality in the Military Than He Is in Defeating Our Enemy’

Morale in the U.S. military has “plummeted” in recent years because President Barack Obama “doesn’t support our soldiers,” won’t even name the enemy “radical Islamic terrorism,” and is “more interested in promoting homosexuality in the military” than in “defeating our enemy,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

Obama's perseverance and total enforcement of the acceptance of homosexuality, especially in the military,  has been his top priority!   He even took his efforts overseas threatening to withdraw money and privileges to the African countries who did not accept homosexuality.

He is also more concerned about protecting the feelings of Muslims than he is about protecting our country and its citizens.   Just think of the progress we could have made if he placed the same effort on ISIS!

Obama is in quite a strange predicament.   We all know he is a Muslim, and a lot of evidence points the fact that he is also homosexual.   We all also know that it is a common practice for Muslims to kill homosexuals, and usually in a most unpleasant manner, such as throwing them from the roof of tall buildings or stoning.      

Monday, December 7, 2015

Whose Side Are We On? Or does anyone really know?

Syria calls US-led coalition air strike on Assad regime forces an 'act of aggression'

An air strike carried out by the US-led coalition in Syria is reported to have targeted regime forces for the first time, killing at least three soldiers and destroying a number of vehicles.
The Syrian government said four warplanes bombed its Saega military camp in Deir al-Zor province, describing it as an "act of aggression" by coalition forces.
According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group, 13 more military personnel were wounded in the strike, which it said took place near the town of Ayyash on Sunday evening.

OK, I’m confused…I know I’m not an expert Military strategist, but I’m pretty sure the Assad Regime forces, and Russia, are at war with ISIS.   So doesn’t that mean we are fighting on the side of ISIS (and against Russia)?
If I’m wring, someone please enlighten me…  

The Foxes are Watching the Hen House; We are the Hens.

At least 72 employees at the Department of Homeland Security are listed on the U.S. terrorist watch list, according to a Democratic lawmaker.
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D., Mass.) disclosed that a congressional investigation recently found that at least 72 people working at DHS also “were on the terrorist watch list.”
“Back in August, we did an investigation—the inspector general did—of the Department of Homeland Security, and they had 72 individuals that were on the terrorist watch list that were actually working at the Department of Homeland Security,” Lynch told Boston Public Radio.

Doesn't that make you feel nice and Safe?

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Pearl Harbor Remembrance day

Tomorrow is Pearl Harbor Remembrance day, which is a day to remember and honor the 2,403 victims who were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. 

I was too young to remember the beginning of The United States involvement in WW2, but, I do have some memory of the war years, and I definitely remember when it ended.

I have heard it said that just about everybody can remember where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news that Kennedy was killed…I honestly have no idea where I was when I heard that news, but I do remember where I was and what I was doing when I heard WW2 had ended, and I was only 6 years old at the time.  

For me, those were the “good old days” because at that age I was oblivious to just how bad things really were.  Looking back, I now realize that this was actually the “bad old days”, not just for our family, but for the entire world.   I mention this because this August is the 70th anniversary of ending of that war.

During that summer in 1945, I lived with my family in Stillwater Oklahoma.  We lived about a block and a half south of the fire station.   If I remember correctly, the address was 1016 South Lewis Street.  It was a very old house, and it was also quite small, and it had an outhouse in the back yard instead of an indoor bathroom.   (Does that sound like “white privilege” to you?) The house is no longer there, it was torn down years ago and you can no longer tell there was ever even a house there.

Every time the siren sounded at the fire station, my brother and I would run out to the street to watch the fire truck go by.  With no TV, or video games, a fire truck going by with siren blowing and lights flashing, was the highlight of the day.   So on one summer day in 1945 we heard the siren and ran out to the street and waited, but the fire truck never came.   Eventually, our Mom came out and explained that the fire truck wasn’t coming.  The siren was sounding celebrating the news that WW2 had just ended.

My brother and I were too young to fully appreciate the news at that time, but in the weeks and months and years to come, we learned to appreciate just how important that day really was.

As everyone knows, or should know, the war ended because the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan.  The first was on August 6, 1945, when an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.  The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people; tens of thousands more would later die of radiation exposure.

Three days later, a second B-29 dropped another A-bomb on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 40,000 people.  Japan’s Emperor Hirohito then announced his country’s unconditional surrender on August 15, citing the devastating power of “a new and most cruel bomb.”

In recent years, I have heard many American citizens, as well as citizens of other countries, criticizing America’s decision to use such inhumane tactics.  They seem to be convinced that the war was almost over and the use of nukes was unnecessary.  The truth is, the war was not almost over, and using the bombs not only saved untold thousands of American lives, it quite possibly saved many Japanese lives as well.

Perhaps these people are unaware that the Japanese were guilty of many war crimes far greater than anything most Americans can even imagine.  Most of which, I have been aware of for many years, but I recently read about a very disturbing incident I had never before heard about.  You can read about it here:  http://universalfreepress.Com/Japanese-dissected-us-bomber-crew-while-they-were-still-alive-in-wwii-photos/

Just in case the article is no longer on that site, here are a couple more links.

It explains how downed American airmen were subjected to horrific medical experiments and were actually dissected while they were still alive during World War Two.

I recently watched a very good movie entitled “unbroken”.  It’s a true story about American POWs during WW2.  If you haven’t seen it, I recommend it.  It shows a little of what the POWs had to endure, but these are just a few examples.   Many American POW’s were used as slave labor, and some were beheaded.  Many American POWs starved to death.  You can learn much more if you Google “Japanese war crimes world war two”.

I realize all these events occurred a very long time ago, and I’m not trying to create resentment, or bring back bad memories for anyone, but before people call President Truman a murderer and a war criminal, they should know all the facts. 

I sometimes feel like our children today are being taught history with a very biased slant which tends to depict America as always being the “bad guys”. I’m not saying America has never made mistakes.  I’m just saying that the manner in which we brought an end to WW2 was not one on them.

Saturday, December 5, 2015

The New World Order.


Americans May Be Locked Up in FEMA Concentration Camps Admits Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Mark Dice believes that Christians, gun owners, Veterans, Tea Partiers, home schoolers, etc., are the targets in the New World Order.

I call for the immediate arrest of President Barack Hussein Obama

Immediate action request to:
Mitch McConnell - Senate Majority Leader
Frank J. Larkin - Sergeant at Arms United States Senate
Paul Ryan - Speaker of the House
Paul D. Irving - Sergeant at Arms United States House of Representatives

I call for the immediate arrest of President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Sortero aka Barry Obama aka Barack Hussein Sortero for the crime of treason.

For repeatedly subverting the constitution of United States of America.

For aiding and abetting our enemies, by giving aid, comfort, material and financial support. For signing into law measures which were not legally passed by congress. 
For illegally selling weapons of war in Libya to Syrian terrorists now known as ISIS aka ISIL
For engaging in an illegal war in Libya, against the war powers act, and without the authorization of the United States Congress. 
For implementing rules of engagement for the US Military designed to allow enemies of the United States to continue operations against the US and it’s allies.

For felony fraud by providing fraudulent documents concerning his eligibility to hold the office of president. 
For providing a forged Hawaiian birth certificate. 
For fraud committed against the Social Security Administration by using a social security number that does not belong to him. 
For identity theft against one Harrison J. Brunnel (now deceased) whose social security number Obama has been fraudulently using. 
For blatant fraud in misstating the scope, cost, and details of the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protection Act. If in fact Mr. Obama is a natural born US citizen, for fraud committed against Columbia University for enrolling and attending as a foreign student.

For blatantly violating federal law by allowing and insisting upon the admittance of individuals belonging to organizations who have declared the US as an enemy, access into the United States.

For illegally suppressing and sealing records of cabinet and judicial appointees.

For failure to instruct the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute the theft of and/or misappropriation of five billion dollars from the US treasury under former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. 
For failure to prosecute former Secretary Clinton for trafficking in classified information.

For illegally using the IRS to suppress organizations whose views oppose his.

For illegally using the EPA to suppress free market commerce under the unproven belief of man made global warming.

For granting exemptions to the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protection Act to campaign contributors.

For illegally suspending the enforcement of federal laws on immigration. 
For illegally implementing de facto amnesty for illegal aliens via executive order. 
For releasing criminal illegal aliens back into the population of the United States.

For repeatedly attempting to infringe upon the 2nd amendment rights of US citizens to keep and bear arms.

For repeatedly attempting to infringe upon the 1st amendment rights of freedom of speech and freedom of religion of of US citizens.

For violating the Constitution by gathering personal information of US citizens without a warrant.

For violating nearly every condition in his oath of office.
I also call for the immediate removal of all cabinet, bureaucratic and judicial appointees made by President Obama, and that all policies, proclamations and judicial decisions made by said appointees be nullified.

This is but a short list of legal offenses committed by the sitting President and is by no means a complete account. Many more violations and crimes are sure to come to light once thoroughly and honestly investigated. His moral offenses also call into question his ability to hold the office of President and Commander in Chief.

Every single elected and appointed official, whether city, county, state or federal who has taken an oath of office, is bound by his or her oath of office to protect and the defend the constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Any and all officials who have failed to take action for the above offenses are in direct violation of their oaths of office.