Sunday, July 31, 2016

Is this what you want for our country?

Is this what you want for our country?

A hardline Muslim preacher suspected of radicalising three British jihadis told teenage disciples that it is ‘permissible’ under Islam to have sex slaves.

Ali Hammuda, an Imam at a Cardiff mosque where three young jihadis from the city worshipped before travelling to Syria to join Islamic State, also told the group of boys as young as 13 that the ‘day of judgment is close’ – a key part of IS’s warped propaganda.

The revelations come amid heightened fears over the Islamist terror threat in the UK in the wake of the bloody attacks in France.

Hammuda is still preaching at the same mosque, two years after the three ‘Cardiff jihadis’ – Nasser Muthana and Reyaad Khan, then 20, and Muthana’s younger brother Aseel, then 17 – left for Syria in 2014.

Read more:

Thursday, July 28, 2016

A Brief History Lesson...A lot of what you think you know, is WRONG

The Truth about the Democratic Party History that Liberals Try to Hide

Regardless of your Political or Religious affiliations, if you are under the age of 30 or so, half of what you were taught about American history is probably wrong.  So, here is a brief lesson in the REAL American history.

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free…   John 8:32

The KKK was founded in Tennessee immediately after the end of the Civil War as a sort of social club for former Confederate Soldiers whose influence quickly spread through the decimated Southern states. 

Klan groups spread throughout the South as a secret vigilante group.  They goal was to restore white supremacy by threats and with violence, including murder, against black and white Republicans.  Their violence was aimed at suppressing blacks voting and running Republicans out of office. 

The “Ku Klux Klan” name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation.  They often formed alliances with Southern police departments, as in Birmingham, AL, or with governor’s offices, as with George Wallace (AL).

The Longest Serving U.S. Senator
Robert Carlyle Byrd, Democrat, (1959- 2010) and was also a member of the KKK.  Byrd recruited 150 of his friends and associates to create a new chapter of the Ku Klux Klan in West Virginia. He was a recruiter and leader in his chapter then became a top officer, an ‘Exalted Cyclops.’
In 1946, Byrd wrote to Senator Theodore Bilbo, Mississippi, “I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

As Columbia professor Eric Foner wrote in his A Short History of Reconstruction, in its early days, the group was loosely bound by one main principle: launching a reign of terror against Republican leaders black and white.

Racism was, of course, a guiding principle, but not quite as guiding as the hatred of the Republicans, the party of Lincoln, the Yankees who early Klansmen believed destroyed their homeland through what they termed a “war of northern aggression.”

The Republican Party had been founded in a schoolhouse in Ripon, Wisconsin just 12 years earlier, and Lincoln was its first president.  The Klan saw both as just as big a menace as the newly freed slaves.  Less than a year after Lincoln’s assassination, the Klan’s anti-Republican ideology spread rapidly.

As Dr. Foner wrote:
In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy.  It aimed to destroy the Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.

In 1868, the Klan elected its first Grand Wizard, Nathaniel Bedford Forrest.  Decades later, his grandson wrote in the September 1928 issue of the Klan’s Kourier Magazine:
I have never voted for any man who was not a regular Democrat.  My father … never voted for any man who was not a Democrat.  My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in reconstruction days….  My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….  My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic party.

Under the elder Forrest, the Klan’s violence grew almost uncontrollable.  PBS’ American Experience reports:
In the time leading up to the 1868 presidential election, the Klan's activities picked up in speed and brutality. The election, which pitted Republican Ulysses S. Grant against Democrat Horatio Seymour, was crucial. Republicans would continue programs that prevented Southern whites from gaining political control in their states. Klan members knew that given the chance, the blacks in their communities would vote Republican.

Across the South, the Klan and other terrorist groups used brutal violence to intimidate Republican voters. In Kansas, over 2,000 murders were committed in connection with the election. In Georgia, the number of threats and beatings was even higher. And in Louisiana, 1000 blacks were killed as the election neared. In those three states, Democrats won decisive victories at the polls.

So remember, it was Democrats.  Not Republicans, not Tea Partiers, but Democrats.

OK, now you know the truth about the KKK.   Now, what do you THINK you know about the National Rifle Association, in which by the way, I am proud to say, have a lifetime Membership.

The NRA was created to PROTECT freed slaves from racist southern DEMOCRAT slave owners.   Does that sound a little far fetched to you?

While we’re learning about history, I would like to invite you to read an old blog of mine which I posted some time ago.  It’s a brief history of the accomplishments of both the Republican and the Democratic Parties:

But hey, don’t take my word for it.  Do a little research.  There’s just no telling what all you “learned” in school that is wrong.


Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Prayer in Public Schools OK for Muslims, but not Christians.

Why do Muslims have rights and privileges that other religions in this country do not have?   Here are 5 Public Schools That Have Installed Muslim Prayer Rooms

1. Desert View High School in Tucson, Arizona, established a prayer room near its library for several Muslim students in 2014.

2. Muslims were allowed "prayer accommodations" in 2013 in the public schools of Dearborn, Michigan.

3. Christian teachers became upset when Muslim students began praying during class at Parkdale High School in Riverdale, Maryland. It was at time of required prayer.

4. At Carver Elementary School in San Diego, administrators allowed Muslims to go on a short break for prayer during one of the scheduled times in 2007. Parents protested the scheduled recess. Although all children were allowed to take breaks at that time, critics charged it was arranged to meet Muslim demands.

5. The city of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada allows prayer rooms for Muslims in public schools, such as Sir Robert Borden High School.
OK, this one is not in the United States…


As was announced by the St. Cloud Minnesota School District, they are being politically correct by giving Muslim students access to “private rooms with prayer rugs for the five daily prayers.” In addition, “Districtwide, school lunch menus provide pork-free options for students, and staff members try to spur the newcomer students’ interest in sports, culture clubs, and other extracurricular activities to develop connections beyond the classroom.”
While the school district is doing everything possible to accommodate Muslims, Christian students are silenced and told to not express their faith.


The latest battleground over religious accommodation and sharia creep is the San Diego public school system. The San Diego Union Tribune reports on a Muslim prayer controversy that has parents and at least one teacher questioning the double standards:

Carver Elementary school in San Diego is possibly going to allow Muslim students to pray in school.
Would someone please explain to me why the ACLU, who has fought all-things Christian for decades, is not only okay with this but is calling everyone who doesn’t agree ‘intolerant’?


If Christians students are not allowed to pray in school nevertheless they should not be forced to learn any other prayer, especially Islamic ones. This is crazy!
In Revere, Massachusetts, students at public schools are not only being forced to learn about the principles and core tenets of the religion of Islam, but they are also being forced to learn the Islam conversion prayer.


There are now millions of American Muslims.
Within the next 20 years, Islam will become the second largest religion, after Christianity in the United States.  Worldwide, there are over one billion Muslims.  Many American educators are finding it necessary to overcome the common lack of familiarity with Islam as growing Muslim communities across the nation express their needs and make their contributions in the public school environment.

My response:  Muslims are not required to attend Public Schools…There are Many non-public schools in this country which have prayer.  Muslims can set up their own church funded schools, and pray all they wish, just like all the other religions in this country.   Why do Muslims have to be given privileges and rights that other religions in this country do not have?

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Great Column By Pat Buchanan... Will Putin Get a Pulitzer?

Will Putin Get a Pulitzer?
By Patrick J. Buchanan

Tuesday - July 26, 2016

Waving off the clerics who had come to administer last rites, Voltaire said: "All my life I have ever made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies look ridiculous.' And God granted it."

The tale of the thieved emails at the Democratic National Committee is just too good to be true.

For a year, 74-year-old Socialist Bernie Sanders has been saying that, under DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the party has been undercutting his campaign and hauling water for Hillary Clinton.

From the 19,200 emails dumped the weekend before
Clinton's coronation, it appears the old boy is not barking mad. The deck was stacked; the referees were in the tank; the game was rigged.

For four decades, some of us have wondered what Jim McCord, security man at CREEP, and his four Cubans were looking for in DNC Chair Larry O'Brien's office at the Watergate. Now it makes sense.

Among the lovely schemes the DNC leaders worked up to gut Sanders in Christian communities of West Virginia and Kentucky, was to tell these good folks that Sanders doesn't even believe that there is a God. He's not even an agnostic; he's an atheist.

The idea was broached by DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall in an email to DNC chief executive officer Amy Dacey:

"Does [Bernie] believe in a God. He has skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and atheist."

Dacey emailed back, "Amen."

In 1960, John F. Kennedy went before the
Houston ministers to assert the right of a Catholic to be president of the United States. Is the "Marshall Plan," to quietly spread word Bernie Sanders is a godless atheist, now acceptable politics in the party of Barack Obama?

Marshall and Dacey are still around at week's end, we will know.

The WikiLeaks dump came Friday night. By Sunday,
Clinton's crowd had unleashed the mechanical rabbit, and the press hounds were dutifully chasing it. The new party line: The Russians did it!

Clinton campaign chief Robert Mook told ABC, "experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke in to the DNC, took all these emails, and now they are leaking them out through the Web sites. ... some experts are now telling us that this was done by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump."

Clinton chairman John Podesta said there is a "kind of bromance going on" between Trump and Vladimir Putin. Campaign flack Brian Fallon told CNN, "There is a consensus among experts that it is indeed Russia that is behind this hack of the DNC."

Purpose: Change the subject. Redirect the media away from the DNC conspiracy to sabotage Sanders' campaign.

Will the press cooperate?
Have something to say about this column?
Visit Pat's FaceBook page and post your comments....

In 1971, The New York Times published secret documents from the Kennedy-Johnson administration on how America got involved in Vietnam. Goal: Discredit the war the Times had once supported, and undercut the war effort, now that Richard Nixon was president.

The documents, many marked secret, had been illicitly taken from Defense Department files, copied, and published by the Times.

America's newspaper of record defended its actions by invoking "the people's right to know" the secrets of their government.

Well, do not the people have "a right to know" of sordid schemes of DNC operatives to sink a presidential campaign?

Do the people not have a right to know that, in denying Sanders' charges, the leadership of the DNC was lying to him, lying to the party, and lying to the country?

What did
Clinton know of Wasserman Schultz's complicity in DNC cheating in the presidential campaign, and when did she know it?

For publishing stolen Defense Department secrets, the Pentagon Papers, the Times got a Pulitzer Prize.

If the Russians were helpful in bringing to the attention of the American people the anti-democratic business being done at the DNC, perhaps the Russians deserve similar recognition.

By the Times' standard of 1971, maybe Putin deserves a Pulitzer.

Undeniably, if the Russians or any foreign actors are interfering in
U.S. presidential elections, we ought to know it, and stop it.

But who started all this?

Since the end of the Cold War, the
U.S. has used cyberwarfare to sabotage centrifuges in the Iranian nuclear plant in Natanz. We have backed "color-coded" revolutions in half a dozen countries from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia — to dump rulers and regimes we do not like, all in the name of democracy.

Unsurprisingly, today,
Russia, China, Egypt and even Israel are shutting down or booting out NGOs associated with the United States, and hacking into websites of U.S. institutions.

We were the first "experts" to play this game. Now others know how to play it. We reap what we sow.


Democrats Have Their Priorities All Screwed Up.

Democrats gave 61 Speeches on the first day of the Convention, and NEVER Mentioned ISIS NOT ONE SINGLE TIME. 

ISIS Knifemen forced French priest to kneel and filmed themselves slitting his throat in horror church attack.

The ISIS terrorists who carried out the France church attack forced an elderly parish priest to kneel before filming themselves slitting his throat, it has emerged.
Father Jacques Hamel, 84, was made to get to his knees before he was brutally butchered at the Church of the Gambetta in Normandy today, says a nun who escaped the attack.

 Terrified nun tells how she managed to escape ISIS jihadis - as it's revealed victim was covering for regular priest who was on HOLIDAY

  • ISIS knifemen sneaked into the church and beheaded priest Jaques Hamel 
  • She managed to escape the attack in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, Reuen 
  • French police shot dead two terrorists after they filmed horror attack 
  • Terror victim was only at church covering because regular priest was away 
  • They performed a sermon in Arabic at the alter before carrying out execution 
  • Adel K, 19, forced priest, 84, to his knees before taking a knife to his throat


Clinton Delegate Explains how Democrats Will Ban All Guns


The 2016 Democratic Party platform endorses a carbon tax on the American people.


Obama Attendance at Paris Climate Change Conference Cost Taxpayers $4,165,068.40



Zero American Flags Seen at DNC Convention, Palestinian and Soviet Flags Raised Instead


Monday, July 25, 2016


Do you remember the Waco massacre in 1993, by our federal Government that led to the death of 76 Americans, including 21 children and two pregnant women?

I always thought it was Bill Clinton, who ordered the attack on these civilians.  But according to the following, it was Hillary.  

Friday, July 15, 2016

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

I don’t know who this person is who wrote and posted the following message on Facebook, but I was very impressed when I read it.

 I also found this interesting picture which goes well with the above message...


Saudi ties to 9/11 to be released

The long-classified pages detailing alleged ties of the Saudi Arabian government to the 9/11 hijackers will be released by Congress as early as Friday, sources told CNN Thursday.
Known as the "28 pages," the secret document was part of a 2002 congressional investigation of the Sept. 11 attacks and has been classified since the report's completion. It turns out there are actually 29 pages, sources said.

Sources said there are still some procedural steps that need to be taken before the release, which members of both parties in Congress and family members of victims have been seeking for years.


Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Why won't Hillary Testify under Oath?

Clinton legal team moves to block deposition in email lawsuit

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Isaiah Crowell of the Cleveland Browns is a Racist and Wannabe Cop Killer

It may have taken years and a lot of hard work for 23-year-old Isaiah Crowell of the Cleveland Browns to make it to the NFL, but only took seconds to dismantle his reputation.  It seems that the arrogant athlete believes he can say whatever he wants and shouldn’t be accountable for it.

 He believes that because he’s black, he’s in the right to feel the way he does about cops.  With an army of Black Lives Matter protesters behind him, filling the streets and not the football stands, he joined their team last week with what he posted.

Of all the hatred toward the police, Crowell managed to combine two evils into one with a depraved drawing of a white cop being beheaded by a man dressed in black, reminiscent of the Islamic State and their methods. With blood gushing from the officer’s neck, Crowell made it personal, writing with the picture.

I don’t know if the NFL fines players for this kind of despicable racist activity or not, but they certainly should.

UPDATE:   Police Threaten to Pull Protection Over Player's Dead Cop Post

Friday, July 8, 2016

Do you remember when???

Remember Whitewater? 
20 years ago James Comey as an attorney on the Senate Whitewater Investigation, was looking into the conduct of President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary Clinton.

The investigation was to determine whether Bill Clinton used his political position as governor of Arkansas (in the 1980s) to push through an illegal loan to benefit Bill and Hillary's business partner in Whitewater.  Several people involved in Whitewater went to jail, but no criminal prosecution was in the cards for Bill and Hillary.  Remember, James Comey was the Deputy Special Counsel for the Whitewater investigation....

In Christopher Anderson's book, American Evita: Hillary Clinton's Rise to Power, Anderson gives details of the New Square offenders pardon by Bill Clinton (who had been convicted of bilking the government of $30 million dollars).  Christopher Anderson relates that at Hillary's urging, Bill gave clemency to 16 Puerto Rican terrorists who took the lives of 16 Americans and wounded many others.  Anderson tells us that Hillary admired the Marxist Carl Oglesby and Saul Alinsky.  It is from her admiration for Saul Alinsky that she formed her belief that "the only way to make a real difference is to acquire power."

The pardon of billionaire Marc Rich (who traded illegally with America's enemies including Iran) by President Bill Clinton was something that everyone knew reeked of impropriety, after learning that Rich's wife donated $450,000 to the Clinton Library.  Again, James Comey oversaw investigations of the pardon matters, as well.  Unbelievably, James Comey did not recommend charging the Clintons in any of these matters.

Comey has made "we the people" Hillary's judge and Jury.

Is Hillary Morally Unfit to Be President?

By Patrick J. Buchanan  -  Thursday - July 7, 2016

Does Hillary Clinton possess the integrity and honesty to be president of the United States? Or are those quaint and irrelevant considerations in electing a head of state in 21st-century America?

These are the questions put on the table by the report from FBI Director James Comey on what his agents unearthed in their criminal investigation of the Clinton email scandal.

Clinton dodged an FBI recommendation that she be indicted for gross negligence in handling U.S. security secrets, a recommendation that would have aborted her campaign. But Director Comey dynamited the defense she has been offering the country.

Comey all but declared that Clinton lied when she said she had State Department approval for the email server in her home.

He all but declared that she lied when she said she had only one server, and that no classified or secret material was transmitted. He also implied that she lied when she said she had used only one device and had turned over all of her work-related emails to State. The FBI found “several thousand” more.

Clinton said her emails were stored in a secure area. This, too, was false. Hostile actors and hostile regimes, said Comey, had access to email systems of those with whom she communicated.

Comey said he found no criminal “intent” in what Clinton did.

Yet, he charged her with having been “extremely careless” with U.S. national security secrets, a phrase that seems synonymous with the gross negligence needed to indict and convict.

While recommending against prosecution, Comey added, “This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequence. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.”

Translation: Were Clinton still the secretary of state and were such recklessness with secrets to be discovered, she could have been forced to resign and stripped of her security clearance forever.

Yet if Clinton is elected president, our commander in chief for the next four years, and her confidantes Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, will all be individuals the FBI has found to be reckless and unreliable in the handling of national security secrets.
We will have security risks running the armed forces of the USA.

Nor is this the first time Clinton’s truthfulness has been called into question. Twenty years ago, she fabricated a tale about crossing a tarmac in Bosnia “under sniper fire,” and running with “our heads down.” Photos showed a peaceful arrival featuring a smiling little girl.

Family members of the dead heroes of Benghazi’s “13 Hours” say Clinton told them she would see to it that the creator of the anti-Islamic video that incited the mob that killed their sons would be run down, all the while knowing it had been a planned terrorist attack.

In 1996, The New York Times’ William Safire went over all of the statements Clinton had made in Whitewater and related scandals of Bill Clinton’s first term, compared them with subsequently revealed truth, and pronounced Hillary Clinton a “congenital liar.”

She has claimed she tried to join the Marines in 1975, and long contended she was named for famed mountaineer Edmund Hillary, who conquered Mount Everest. Only Sir Edmund climbed Everest when Hillary was 6 years old. The perfect running mate for this serial fabricator would be the Cherokee lass Elizabeth Warren.

Still, a question arises as to Comey’s motives in airing the findings of an FBI investigation. Normally, the bureau passes on the evidence it has found, along with its recommendation, to the Justice Department. And Justice decides whether to prosecute.
Instead, Comey called a press conference, documented the charge that Clinton was “extremely careless,” contradicted, point by point, the story she has told the public, then announced he was recommending against prosecution.
What was behind this extraordinary performance?

By urging no prosecution, but providing evidence for a verdict of criminal negligence in handing classified material, Comey was saying:
I am not recommending prosecution, because, to do that, would be to force Hillary Clinton out of the race, and virtually decide the election of 2016. And that is my not decision. That is your decision.

You, the American people, should decide, given all this evidence, if Clinton should be commander in chief. You decide if a public figure with a record of such recklessness and duplicity belongs in the Oval Office.

Comey was making the case against Clinton as the custodian of national security secrets with a credibility the GOP cannot match, while refusing to determine her fate by urging an indictment, and instead leaving her future in our hands.

And, ultimately, should not this decision rest with the people, and not the FBI?
If, knowing what we know of the congenital mendacity of Hillary Clinton, the nation chooses her as head of state and commander in chief, then that will tell us something about the America of 2016.

And it will tell us something about the supposed superiority of democracy over other forms of government.

Here’s a theory I have.  Perhaps Comey believes that Hillary will be more likely to be defeated than any other Democrat that might replace her.  If that’s the case, I sure hope it doesn’t backfire.  If Hillary is elected, Comey will be public enemy number one.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016


The federal Government has always been a strong enforcer of keeping secrets a secret.  
Those who were even the least little bit in violation have always been punished in the harshest and most excessive manner. 
I myself kept secrets from my own wife, family, and closest friends for over forty years; (until I learned for sure that they had been declassified) even though I knew they were no longer of much importance.

For those of you who may not know, there are three different levels of classification; top secret, secret, and classified, with classified being the lowest level of importance.  Divulging any classified information, regardless of the class of classification, is in fact a felony.  It does not matter if it was done intentionally or accidentally through carelessness or mishandling, it is STILL a felony, although the penalty would probably be much more severe if intentional.   People have been hanged for intentionally divulging top secret information. 

It is interesting to note that the Obama administration has prosecuted more violations under the 1917 Espionage Act than all prior administrations combined.  See following link:

Do you not find it just a bit strange that this extreme, unforgiving record of prosecution for the mishandling of classified information suddenly came to a halt just in time to save Hillary?

This is nothing less than a slap in the face to everyone who is expected to play by the rules and obey the rule of law.  This country is based on rule of law, and everybody is expected to obey rule of law.  The Constitution requires equal enforcement of the law for everyone.  Without rule of law and equal enforcement of the law, we have nothing.

FBI Director James Comey, in a press conference, condemned Clinton saying that she and her colleagues were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” including Top Secret material.   See following link:

Congressman Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight Committee said:   We are in a crisis because Hillary Clinton, if the voters do not stop her, will be the next President of the United States.  She will, in fact, on Day One say, “Pardon me,” and she’ll mean it.  She’ll have pardoned herself.  She will have, in fact, gone from being a criminal involved in a criminal enterprise (I think he was referring to Clinton Cash ) and somebody who flaunted the security laws, the privacy laws, the presidential and the Federal Records Act, and gotten away with it.

Here's the best tweet of the day...

Sunday, July 3, 2016

Leonardo DiCaprio, The Lord of Global Warming

DiCaprio flies his LA friends 6,000 miles around the world so they can listen to his speech on GLOBAL WARMING

When Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio hosts a reception for a string of A-list stars, supermodels and wealthy philanthropists later this month, he will make an impassioned plea for more action to be taken on global warming.
But instead of holding the event in Los Angeles, where most of his guests are based, they will fly halfway around the world to the glitzy French resort of St Tropez – at enormous cost to the environment.

It is estimated DiCaprio has potentially emitted up to 418 tons of CO2 this year alone because of his globe-trotting.   SO, if CO2 really did cause Global warming, he is one of the biggest offenders.


Donald Trump Says “the fix is in” on the FBI’s criminal probe of Hillary Clinton.

NEW YORK – A Donald Trump Tweet late Saturday afternoon adds to the growing concern “the fix is in” on the FBI’s criminal probe of Hillary Clinton.
CNN is reporting its sources expect an announcement to be made within two weeks that no charges will be filed against the Democratic presidential candidate for president.

At 4:06 p.m Eastern time Saturday, within hours of Hillary Clinton’s interview with the FBI, Teddy Davis, a senior producer at CNN, began tweeting that the “expectation” is that no criminal charges will be brought against Clinton, provided no wrongdoing emerged in today’s interview.

On Saturday, various news sources reported earlier in the day that Cheryl Mills, Hillary’s chief of staff at the State Department, accompanied Mrs. Clinton to the FBI interview.

Mills’ attendance at Clinton’s FBI interview adds to the controversy calling for Attorney General Loretta Lynch to recuse herself in the FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email controversy that developed Friday when news sources revealed former President Bill Clinton delayed his takeoff in order to maneuver a 20-25 private meeting with Lynch in her airplane on the tarmac at Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix, Arizona.

Loretta Lynch and Cheryl Mills law firm tied to Hillary Clinton

Lynch was with the Washington-headquartered international law firm Hogan & Hartson LLP from March 2002 through April 2010.

Cheryl Mills also worked at Hogan & Hartson, for two years, starting in 1990, before she joined then President-elect Bill Clinton’s transition team, on her way to securing a position as White House deputy counsel in the Clinton administration.

On May 27, in her Judicial Watch deposition on pages 12-13 of the transcript, Mills explained she had worked for Hogan & Hartson prior to working at the White House.

The exact question-and-answer sequence was recorded as follows:
Question: OK, and when did you graduate from Virginia, from UVA [University of Virginia].

Answer: Do I have to say that? I am so old. I graduated from UVA in 1987, and I graduated from Stanford Law School in 1990.

Question: OK. Great. Thank you. And right out of law school you went to a law firm. Is that right?

Answer: I did. I went to work at Hogan & Hartson, which is a law firm here in Washington, D.C., though their name has changed.

Question: OK. And what did you do for them, practice as a litigator, or which –
Answer: I represented school districts that were still seeking to implement the promises of Brown vs. The Board of Education.

Question: OK. Is that litigation?

Answer: So it was a conglomerate of activities, but also included litigation.
Question: OK. And then after that?

Answer: After that I went to work in the White House. In the in-between period I went and worked on the Clinton campaign and on the transition. And then went to work in the White House, and was at the – in the White House for about seven years.

Question: OK. And when did you start working in the White House? Not specific date, but year-wise.

Answer: Oh, I know. So it would have been in 1993.

According to documents Hillary Clinton’s first presidential campaign made public in 2008, Hogan & Hartson’s New York-based partner Howard Topaz was the tax lawyer who filed income tax returns for Bill and Hillary Clinton beginning in 2004.

In addition, Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent trademark request on May 19, 2004, for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has observed that employees of MX Logic could have had access to all the emails that went through her account.

In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated Lynch for the first of her two terms as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position she held until she joined Hogan & Hartson in March 2002.

While there is no evidence that Lynch played a direct role either in the tax work done by the firm for the Clintons or in linking Hillary’s private email server to MX Logic, the ethics of the legal profession hold all partners jointly liable for the actions of other partners in a business.

“If Hogan and Hartson previously represented the Clintons on tax matters, it is incumbent upon U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to [disclose] what, if any, role she had in such tax matters,” said Tom Fitton, president of Washington-based Judicial Watch.

ALSO SEE:  Loretta Lynch falls under the Clinton's’ corrupting influence