Saturday, January 31, 2015

Obama Not ‘Imperial Master, Congress Not Required To Help Him Break Law



Is there any country in the world that says it’s appropriate for a business to hire somebody who entered that country unlawfully?
What kind of logic can support such reasoning?
The president is not an imperial master …





   

Loretta Lynch Must NOT be Confirmed as Attorney General. NOT NOW... NOT EVER



That Awkward Moment Obama’s Replacement for Eric Holder Came Face-to-Face with Ted Cruz

Senator Ted Cruz recently questioned Loretta Lynch, Obama’s potential replacement for Attorney General Eric Holder.   She didn’t seem pleased with Senator Cruz’s questions.
READ MORE:

Friday, January 30, 2015

What if Obama declared Martial Law?



Obama has been stirring the pot, almost as though he wants the people to rise up.  That would give him the right to declare martial law - any dictator's dream.  
He is trying to disarm us.  The government is stockpiling ammo......... Hmm, makes one wonder.  
In the summer of 2009, a somewhat disturbing ad began appearing on internet employment sites, the ad in question was placed by the National Guard. 

Apparently, the Guard is now looking for people to work at internment camps.
Here is the ad as it appeared:

Correction Officer Internment / Resettlement Specialist

As an Internment/Resettlement Specialist for the Army National Guard, you will ensure the smooth running of military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility, similar to those duties conducted by civilian Corrections Officers. This will require you to know proper procedures and military law; and have the ability to think quickly in high-stress situations. Specific duties may include assisting with supervision and management operations; providing facility security; providing custody, control, supervision, and escort; and counseling individual prisoners in rehabilitative programs.

So, why is the National Guard hiring “Internment / Resettlement Specialists?”

On December 31, 2011, while on vacation in Hawaii, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law which in addition to allocating $662 billion to the Pentagon also contains a measure which allows U.S. citizens to be taken into custody and held indefinitely without ever being charged with a crime.

Not only can any citizen deemed a threat to “national security interests of the United States,” be held forever without receiving a trial, but the military will be the ones arresting those citizens.

NDAA Section 1022, subsection c allows “(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.”

This law basically repeals habeas corpus, by not requiring the government to give cause or evidence as to why the person is being detained; the 6th Amendment which ensures U.S. citizens the right to counsel as well as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which prevents federal military forces from being deployed and used against U.S. citizens.

And what would the government do with all of those citizens?

There is a list of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) camps which was complied by WorldTruthTV: There are hundreds of them located all over the United States.


Have you Heard about the Sharia Law Tribunal in Texas



This is how it started in the United Kingdom.
When Sharia courts were instituted there, Muslim and non-Muslim officials alike all assured the British public and the world that they would be voluntary, restricted to matters involving non-criminal matters, and subject to the British courts.
Any areas in which British law and Sharia law conflicted would be referred not to the Sharia courts, but to the British courts.
That is not how it worked out. The Telegraph reported in August 2011 that “there are growing concerns” that the Sharia courts “are creating a parallel legal system — and one that is developing completely unchecked.” The Independent stated in April 2012 “some Sharia law bodies have been misrepresented by the media as being transparent, voluntary and operating in accordance with human rights and equality legislation. This is not the case. Many Sharia law bodies rule on a range of disputes from domestic violence to child residence all of which should be dealt with by UK courts of law.” Instead, “they operate within a misogynist and patriarchal framework which is incompatible with UK legislation.”

WAKE UP PEOPLE; Call your Congressman and Senators.


Monday, January 26, 2015

Obama Owes Texas and Rick Perry a Huge ‘Thank You’



Even as there are more Americans dependent on government (other taxpayers) because of Obama’s lousy economic record, and 92 million Americans are out of the workforce, the lowest number since the days of Democrat President Jimmy Carter, Obama, a Marxist economic illiterate, continues to say how well the economy is doing. 

Whatever supposed economic success Obama has had can be attributed to the job growth Mostly in one state, led by one Republican governor, Texas under Rick Perry. 
A few other “RED” states have also had economic success.





 SHARE THIS WITH EVERYBODY.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

List of Black American Republicans



When people think of Republicans, they often think of a typical stereotype.
Here is a list of famous Republicans that may surprise you — a list that dispels those stereotypes that often comes to mind.
Unfortunately, when many people hear the word Republican, some of the biggest myths and Republican stereotypes are mistakenly thought of as truth or fact.

SEE LIST HERE:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_Republicans

 



Obama Announces He’ll Shred the Constitution to Help Iran



Obama Announces He’ll Shred the Constitution to Help Iran

Friday, January 23rd, 2015
Former President George W. Bush declared the tyrannical Islamic theocracy in Iran as part of an “Axis of Evil” and was committed to containing them with sanctions to prevent their obtaining a nuclear weapon.

In contrast, President Barack Obama has extended a friendly hand to Iran’s regime and is resisting further sanctions against them while secretly negotiating an agreement that could allow them the nuclear arms they so desire.

But Obama’s secret negotiations with Iran are not viewed favorably by Congress, where bipartisan support exists for new and tougher sanctions on Iran, despite Obama’s threat to veto any such legislation.

On top of his threats to veto new Iran sanctions, Obama is also claiming that he doesn’t need congressional approval for the secret agreement he is working on with the Iranian regime.

“Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the White House doesn’t view an agreement with Iran as a treaty that requires Senate approval, but a matter of ‘executive prerogative,'” according to a report from National Review.

However, it appears that the constitutional law professor in the Oval Office needs to brush up on Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of said Constitution, which reads:  “(The president) shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.”

To be sure, Obama’s negotiations with Iran wouldn’t be such a big deal if everyone were confident that he would secure a worthy agreement. Sadly, that is not the case.
In fact, it is widely believed that Obama’s negotiations will fail and Iran will ultimately obtain the nuclear weapons they have been after for years.

Hopefully, Congress will press ahead with readying new sanctions against Iran that which could be applied immediately after talks break down, as seems likely.
Furthermore, Congress should also pass legislation directly prohibiting any type of agreement whatsoever with Iran without their direct approval.

SOURCE: http://conservativetribune.com/obama-shred-constitution/

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter if you aren’t surprised that Obama will try to go around Congress yet again.


Friday, January 23, 2015

ALERT: Legislation Introduced to Let Illegal Immigrants VOTE



Legal voters: they’re so passe.
I mean, why should we just let those who are eligible pick the people who will run our country?
The District of Columbia absolutely agrees with this sentiment, and they’re willing to let illegal immigrants vote to prove it. A new D.C. law is specifically designed to allow those illegally in this country to vote, and it could have broader implications within the United States.
 
Democrats will do ANYTHING to try to increase their voting base.




Thursday, January 22, 2015

Obama ‘Disses’ Fallen Cop, Honors Lawbreaker



While past presidents have always invited special guests to sit with their spouses during the annual State of the Union address to the nation, historians have pointed out they usually invited those who either achieved an act of bravery or contributed to the betterment of the United States.
However, President Barack Obama is known for inviting guests to sit with First Lady Michelle Obama to illustrated what he believes are his achievements and his contributions.
Such was the case with Obama’s special guest on Tuesday night, someone who according to U.S. law is in the United States illegally, college student Ana Zamora.

Several law enforcement officers were angry over Obama’s failure to include at least one family member who lost a military or law enforcement serving husband or son such as the two NYPD officers, Det. Rafael Ramos and Det. Wenjian Liu assassinated by a black, Islamist named Ismaaiyl Abdullah-Muhammad Brinsley. In fact, there were no widows or fatherless/ motherless children of soldiers or cops seen with the First Lady, according to former police officer Iris Aquino. “Why would Obama invite them? After all, he and his Attorney General have shown repeatedly their dislike for cops,” the Hispanic cop said. 

In addition, while boasting about an illegal alien success story, Obama had no one present from the families of two slain California law enforcement officers — Sheriff’s Deputy Danny Oliver and Det. Michael Davis — who were shot to death in October by an illegal alien released from detention thanks to another new Obama immigration policy. 





Marine Sgt. Tahmooressi is Guest at the S.T.O.U Address!



Marine Corps Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi, who was held captive in a Mexico prison for more than seven months, was a guest at this year’s State of the Union Address.
Now at first thought, you might think that since President Obama, who traded five Gitmo terrorist for a soldier who deserted his unit, or sent a delegation to free a kid from North Korea who tried to defect, would have invited him to be his guest since he did absolutely nothing to secure his release from our neighbor and ally… 

Don’t be a fool!   Of course President Obama did not invite him…

Where did his invite come from? Duncan Hunter, a Republican representative from California, not even Sgt. Tahmooressi’s home state. Why would a representative from California campaign so hard for his release and then invite him to be a guest at the State of the Union Address? Because Duncan Hunter is a Marine himself and if there is one thing any Marine can count on, it’s another Marine!





Wednesday, January 21, 2015

The Parallels Between Obama and Lincoln – (They Are Uncanny!)



Most of us know of the comparable relationship between Lincoln and Kennedy; but have you ever considered the comparisons between President Obama and Lincoln?
You might be quite surprised…

Parallels of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Hussein Obama:

1.     Lincoln placed his hand on the Bible for his inauguration Obama used the very same Bible Lincoln used, for his inauguration.

2.     Lincoln came from Illinois. Obama comes from Illinois.

3.     Lincoln served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.

4.     Lincoln had very little experience before becoming President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.

5.     Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.

6.     Lincoln was highly respected by some, but intensely disliked by others. Obama is highly respected by some, but intensely disliked by others.

7.     Abraham Lincoln was a tall, skinny lawyer. Barack Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

8.     Lincoln held to basic Conservative and Christian views. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

9.     Lincoln volunteered in the Illinois militia; once as a captain, twice as a private. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

10. Lincoln firmly believed in able persons carrying their own weight. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

11. Lincoln‘s administration had to borrow a lot of money to abolish slavery and save our nation, via the Civil War. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

12. Lincoln was undeniably, and without any doubt, born in the United States. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

13. Lincoln was honest – so honest that he was called ‘Honest Abe’. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer

14. Lincoln preserved the United States as a strong nation, respected by the world. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

15. Lincoln showed his obvious respect for the flag, U. S. Constitution, and the military. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

Amazing, isn’t it?



Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Obama 'switched sides' in war on terror.



Generals conclude Obama backed al-Qaida
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 01/19/2015 @ 10:25 pm In Front Page,Politics,U.S.,World | No Comments

NEW YORK – The Obama White House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

In WND interviews, several members of the commission have disclosed their finding that the mission of Christopher Stevens, prior to the fall of Gadhafi and during Stevens’ time as U.S. ambassador, was the management of a secret gun-running program operated out of the Benghazi compound.
The Obama administration’s gun-running project in Libya, much like the “fast and furious” program under Eric Holder’s Justice Department, operated without seeking or obtaining authorization by Congress.

WND reported Monday that in exclusive interviews conducted with 11 of the 17 members of the commission, it is clear that while the CCB is still enthusiastic to work with Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, and hopeful that Boehner is serious about the investigation, various members of the CCB, speaking on their own behalf and not as spokesmen for the commission, are expressing concerns, wanting to make sure the Gowdy investigation is not compromised by elements within the GOP.

The Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi’s interim report, in a paragraph titled “Changing sides in the War on Terror,” alleges “the U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias throughout the 2011 rebellion.”
The report asserted the jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy.

“The rebels made no secret of their Al Qaeda affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple media reports,” the interim report said. “And yet, the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al Qaeda.”

The report concluded: “The result in Libya, across much of North Africa, and beyond has been utter chaos, disruption of Libya’s oil industry, the spread of dangerous weapons (including surface-to-air missiles), and the empowerment of jihadist organizations like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Christopher Stevens: ’1st U.S. envoy to al-Qaida’
In the WND interviews, several members of the citizens’ commission, speaking for themselves, not for the commission, added important background to the interim report’s conclusion.
“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,” explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who served as a career operations officer with the CIA and current is vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.

“At that time, Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-related militia in Libya,” Lopez continued. “The weapons were produced at factories in Eastern Europe and shipped to a logistics hub in Qatar. The weapons were financed by the UAE and delivered via Qatar mostly on ships, with some possibly on airplanes, for delivery to Benghazi. The weapons were small arms, including Kalashnikovs, rocket-propelled grenades and lots of ammunition.”

Lopez further explained that during the period of time when Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-affiliated militia in Libya, he was living in the facility that was later designated the Special Mission Compound in Benghazi.

“This was about weapons going into Libya, and Stevens is coordinating with Abdelhakim Belhadj, the leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, other al-Qaida-affiliated militia leaders and leaders of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood that directed the rebellion against Qadhafi as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood,” Lopez said. “Many of the individual members of the al-Qaida-related militias, including the LIFG, and the groups that would later become Ansar Al-Sharia, were Muslim Brotherhood members first.”

According to the interim report, as detailed by Lopez, a delegation from the UAE traveled to Libya after the fall of Gadhafi to collect payment for the weapons the UAE had financed and that Qatar had delivered to the Transitional National Council in Libya during the war.

“The UAE delegation was seeking $1 billion it claimed was owed,” the interim report noted. “During their visit to Tripoli, the UAE officials discovered that half of the $1 billion worth of weapons it had financed for the rebels had, in fact, been diverted by Mustafa Abdul Jalil, the Muslim Brotherhood head of the Libyan TNC, and sold to Qaddafi.”

According to information discovered during the UAE visit to Tripoli, when Jalil learned that Maj. Gen. Abdel Fatah Younis, Gadhafi’s former minister of the interior before his late February 2011 defection to the rebel forces, had found out about the weapons diversion and the $500 million payment from Gadhafi, Jalil ordered Abu Salim Abu Khattala, leader of the Abu Obeida Bin al-Jarrah brigade to kill Younis.

“Abu Khattala, later identified as a Ansar al- Shariah commander who participated in the 11 September 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, accepted the orders and directed the killing of Gen. Younis in July 2011,” the interim report noted.

Abu Khattala is currently in custody in New York awaiting trial under a Department of Justice-sealed indictment, after U.S. Delta Force special operations personnel captured him over the weekend of June 14-15, 2014, in a covert mission in Libya. Abu Khattala’s brigade merged into Ansar al-Shariah in 2012, and he was positively identified to the FBI in a cell phone photo from the scene of the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

The language of the interim report made clear why the sequence of events is important.
“The key significance of this episode is the demonstration of a military chain-of-command relationship between the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the TNC and the Al Qaeda-affiliated militia (Ansar al-Shariah) that has been named responsible for the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,” the interim Rreport concluded.

“What we have here is the Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the revolution giving a kill order to a Muslim militia affiliated with al-Qaida, which then carried it out,” Lopez summarized. “This chain-of-command link is important even though it has not yet received enough attention in the media.

A big ‘oh no’ moment
“After Gadhafi is deposed and Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya, the flow of weapons reverses,” Lopez noted. “Now Stevens has the job of overseeing the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS.”

Lopez distinguished that “al-Nusra in Syria still claims allegiance to al-Qaida, while ISIS has broken away from al-Qaida, not because ISIS is too violent, but out of insubordination, after Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, wanted to run his own show inside Syria as well as Iraq, thereby disobeying orders from al-Qaida leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri.”

She noted that in this period of time, after the fall of Gadhafi and before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound, Stevens was working with Turkey to ship weapons out of Libya into Syria for the use of the rebels fighting Assad.

According to the authors of the bestselling book “13 Hours,” on Sept. 11, 2012, before the attack on the Benghazi compound started, Stevens had dinner with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin. Stevens reportedly escorted the Turkish diplomat outside the main gate of the Benghazi compound to say good-bye to Akin at approximately 7:40 p.m. local time, before he returned to Villa C to retire for the evening.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA counterintelligence expert who worked on the seventh floor at Langley as protective staff to then-CIA Director William Casey, again speaking for himself in his interview with WND, agreed with Lopez that the gun-running operation Stevens managed is a secret the Obama White House and Clinton State Department have sought to suppress from the public.

“The shocking part, maybe even a violation of international law that the Obama administration has been terrified to have fully revealed, is that Stevens as part of his duties as a State Department employee was assisting in the shipment of arms first into Libya for the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, with the weapons shipped subsequently out of Libya into Syria for use by the al-Qaida-affiliated rebels fighting Assad,” Shipp told WND.

“Very possibly, these gun-running activities could be looked at even as treasonable offenses,” he said.
Shipp further noted that in gun-running operations in which the CIA wants deniability, the CIA generally involves a third party.

“The way the CIA works is through a ‘cut-out,’ in that you get Qatar to transport the weapons and you facilitate the transport. So now the third party is to blame,” he explained.

“Qatar probably would have been able to pull this off without any attribution to the CIA if the Benghazi attack had not happened. The attack basically shed the light on this operation the White House, the State Department and the CIA were trying to keep quiet,” he said.

“The attack on Benghazi was a big ‘oh no’ moment.”



Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com
URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/generals-conclude-obama-backed-al-qaida/



A Look at The Holy Quran



A vast majority of Muslims believe that the Quran is the divine word of Allah, meant to be taken literally and not interpreted for something spiritual.
It appears that our President wants America to embrace Islam and the Quran.  Since this is the case, here is a look at a few of the teachings of the Quran.


This is a good start, but there are a lot of other interesting and informative things in the Quran.  For example; The sun sets in a swamp, there are seven heavens above the earth that Allah keeps from falling and crushing us, there are six more earths underneath our earth, shooting stars are missiles that Allah hurls at demons to keep them out of heaven.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Memo to To President Obama:



It was you who told an Islamic dinner – “I am one of you.”

It was you who on ABC News referenced – “My Muslim faith.”

It was you who gave $100 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to re-build foreign mosques.

It was you who wrote that in the event of a conflict -“I will stand with the Muslims.”

It was you who assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that – “I am a Muslim.”

It was you who bowed in submission before the Saudi King.

It was you who sat for 20 years in a Liberation Theology Church condemning Christianity and professing Marxism.

It was you who exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay.

It was you who purposefully omitted – “endowed by our Creator” – from your recitation of The Declaration Of Independence.

It was you who mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ’s Sermon On The Mount while repeatedly referring to the ‘HOLY’ Quran.

It was you who traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States of America.

It was you who instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of the Ground Zero Victory mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center.

It was you who refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic prayer breakfast at the White House.

It was you who ordered both Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak, but in contrast, you have NEVER requested that the mosques you have visited adjust their decor.

It was you who appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps.

It was you who appointed rabid Islamists to Homeland Security.

It was you who said that NASA’s “foremost mission” was an outreach to Muslim communities.

It was you who as an Illinois Senator were the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide.

It was you who were the first President not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House, and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the WH tree.

It was you who curtailed the military tribunals of all Islamic terrorists.

It was you who refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist.

It is you who has refused to speak-out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture, but yet, have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human-rights abuses.

It was you who when queried in India refused to acknowledge the true extent of radical global Jihadists, and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorists assaults.

It was you who funneled $900 Million in U.S. taxpayer dollars to Hamas.

It was you who ordered the USPS to honor the MUSLIM holiday with a new commemorative stamp.

It was you who directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help “empower” the British Muslim community.

It was you who embraced the fanatical Muslim Brotherhood in your quest to overthrow the Egyptian President, Hosni Mubarak.

It was you who funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in Grammar schools across our country.

It is you who follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan.

It is you who departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for NOT participating in seasonal White House religious events.

It was you who was un-characteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, formerly America’s strongest ally in North Africa; but, remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood led slaughter of Egyptian Christians.

It was you who appointed as your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, who is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Friday, January 16, 2015

I Cannot Tolerate Intolerant People.



Why is it that everyone on the planet, except Muslims, must be tolerant of other persons, other religions, other ethnicity, etc?

A case in point is the cafe owner who was ordered to remove an extractor fan because the smell of her frying bacon offended passing Muslims. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8077906/Cafe-fan-banned-in-case-smell-of-bacon-offends-Muslims.html

Another example is the man who was told to Remove American Flag Because ‘It’s a Threat to Muslims’http://www.tpnn.com/2014/06/19/video-man-told-to-remove-american-flag-because-its-a-threat-to-muslims/

There are hundreds of examples I could mention.  Some are downright absurd, like these two: http://godfatherpolitics.com/19796/publisher-bans-mention-pork-pigs-books-avoid-offending-muslims/  


There is a very old and very well known quote that says “I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend to the death your right to say it”…I’m not sure who really said that.  Most people believe it was Fran├žois-Marie Arouet, better known as “Voltaire”.

It is most unfortunate that Muslims are too damned intolerant to have that same attitude about Americans eating pork.  It’s not like we are insisting that they eat it.  We have certain rights,  and eating pork is one of our rights.
Nowhere in our constitution does it say that anyone has the right to not ever be offended.

I am sick and tired of our government officials taking away our rights because someone might be offended.  This is about a whole lot more than bacon; this is about out right to display the American flag and a whole lot more.

Take a stand my fellow Americans before it’s too late.  Don’t stand by and do nothing just because it has not yet affected you personally.  It WILL affect you eventually.  If you do nothing, you will wake up one day to find you are now controlled by Sharia law.








LAST BUT NOT LEAST, READ THIS:  http://madworldnews.com/muslim-no-go-zones/
   

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Supreme Court Considers Presidential Eligibility Requirement Case



It’s About Time.
It’s unfortunate this wasn’t done YEARS ago.
On behalf of former presidential candidates John Dummett and Ed Noonan, the U.S. Justice Foundation recently submitted a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court to determine what safeguards are constitutionally mandated in ensuring a candidate is qualified to run. The action is in response to two previous court rulings suggesting California’s secretary of state does not have a responsibility to verify a presidential candidate’s status as a natural born citizen.

The USJF petition cites the U.S. Constitution, specifically Article II, Section 2, which says state legislatures are tasked with determining eligibility. Given the nation’s current electoral process, the court document holds these lawmakers must provide voters with a choice between candidates who meet constitutional requirements for the position they seek.

The petition chronicles the court history of the issue, including appeals court decisions the petitioners conclude were based on faulty logic. The appeal provides three reasons that, through the role of California’s chief elections officer, the secretary of state should be tasked with verifying a presidential candidate’s eligibility.

First, USJF argues that no sufficient pathway to challenging a candidate’s qualification exists on the federal level. The petition describes the arduous process needed to complete such a challenge through the U.S. Congress, concluding that since the remedy is “so limited in its scope, the question of whether a candidate for President is eligible for the office cannot be effectively address, much less resolved, under current constitutional or statutory law.”

That argument leads to the second point, namely that both the Electoral College and U.S. Congress lack any authority to determine a presidential candidate’s eligibility.
Finally, the petitioners contend that current statutes compelling the California secretary of state to place major political parties’ nominees on the state’s ballot is in direct conflict with the duty to comply with existing election laws.

In its conclusion, the petition asserts that the appellants represented “have demonstrated that questions of eligibility are not properly before any entity other than the court or the chief elections officer of the State of California” and “that the Secretary of State has a ministerial duty to verify a candidates [sic] eligibility.”








Where was Obama? Where was Eric Holder? Where was America?



Over the weekend, about four million people marched in Paris in memory of the victims of last week’s tragic massacre.   Leaders from countries around the world were there to show their respect and solidarity with the French people.  
Where was Obama?  Where was Eric Holder?  Where was America?  The media from all around the globe have asked this same question.

When we suffered the attack on 9/11, we received the support of the world,  and we can’t even do the same for one of our major allies who suffered terribly at the hand of Islamic extremists?  Why is that?

Perhaps the answer is because our president sympathizes with the agenda of these terrorists.  Perhaps he hates non-Muslims.  Perhaps he hates white people in general.  This administration has fomented racism every chance it gets.  Obama relates to the victim-hood these Islamists feel.  He can understand their anger because he feels it as well.

That is why he so famously said, “The future does not belong to those who slander the Prophet Mohammed.”  He believes the French deserved this.  He especially believes the English and the other colonial powers deserved this. He does not believe in core American values.  He gives them lip service.

It should be obvious to all members of congress that many of Obama’s transgressions rise to the level of an impeachable offenses, and it is incumbent upon them to begin impeachment proceedings.


Remember the "empty chair" that Clint Eastwood mentioned?

ALSO READ: