If Hillary Clinton were to achieve her dream of capturing the White House in November, she would use her vast power to erase American liberty as we know it.
Hillary’s record in targeting the First and Second amendments—the two amendments that inseparably protect all of our freedoms—sets her apart as the most anti-freedom candidate to run for the White House.
Hillary winning the Presidency would be just as bad as the Communist Party winning – Oh wait; it would be the SAME thing because the Communist is backing her. The KKK is also backing her. All of the Islamic state countries are also backing her, but of course they cannot legally vote, but they have contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to her.Hillary has openly said that the U.S. Supreme Court, which has twice affirmed the individual right to keep and bear arms, “is wrong on the Second Amendment.”
With the untimely, and very suspicious death of Justice Scalia, we have lost the Strongest supporter of the First and second amendments. Hillary has bragged about her plan to “take back the Second Amendment from these extremists.”
“Take back” a right guaranteed by our founders to every peaceable American? The Second Amendment says, “the right of the people,” not the right of Hillary. And there is nothing extreme about protecting American liberty—a cause we NRA members embrace every day.
In a key moment of a New Hampshire “town hall” campaign stop, Hillary was asked: “Recently, Australia managed to get away, or take away tens of thousands, millions of handguns. In one year, they were all gone. Can we do that?” Without hesitation, she said, “It’s worth considering.” In Hillary’s world, “worth considering” means just doing it.
Hillary’s obvious contempt for the Second Amendment and for Americans who fight to keep that right intact is matched only by her disgust for the freedom of assembly and free speech that are central to preserving liberty. She has pledged to rewrite the First Amendment to ban expenditures for purely political speech—the heart of the grassroots effectiveness of the NRA.
She fears the concept of the right of the people to assemble around political ideals and constitutional principles. She fears the ability of individual Americans to pool their funds to communicate those ideas. She loathes the notion that constitutionally protected assemblies like the NRA can use free speech to protect the rights of all Americans.
I hear people saying that Hillary won’t have the power to amend the Constitution if she’s elected, but with just one or two political appointees, she and other anti-gun elites will own the U.S. Supreme Court. She does not need to amend the Constitution, all she has to do is amend the way the Supreme Court interprets it.
As it stands, the Second Amendment hangs by the balance of one seat on the high court. In both Heller (which struck down the Washington, D.C., law prohibiting handgun ownership and armed self-defense in the home) and McDonald (which extended the right to keep and bear arms to the rest of the nation by striking down Chicago’s gun ban), the court was split five-four.
But over the next four years, there could likely be at least four vacancies on the high court. If it’s a Hillary hand-picked court, our nation as we know it could be sunk. She has remarked that she thinks Obama would be an excellent choice for the Supreme Court.
Imagine if Obama, or former Attorney General Eric Holder, or New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, or U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) or political operative John Podesta as Supreme Court justices.
With a Hillary-controlled Supreme Court, the Constitution will be shredded and our liberty will be destroyed. Such a Supreme Court would wipe out the separation of powers and render Congress meaningless. Executive lawlessness would rule the day.