As Europe continues to
collapse financially and socially under the weight of an Islamic invasion, America’s Muslim-in-chief
has determined to cut the time for screening unvetted Muslims coming into our
country from Syria, thus knowingly
endangering the people he is supposed to serve.
Of course, none of this surprises those who have warned about who
Barack Hussein Obama Soeotoro Sobarkah actually is.
Adam
Kredo at Washington Free Beacon reports that representatives are warning about
the Obama administration’s reckless time cut on vetting Muslims is a national
security risk.
An
Obama administration plan to resettle a greater number of foreign refugees in
the United States by expediting
the screening process is drawing concern from Capitol Hill, where lawmakers are
warning that the administration is not capable of properly screening these
individuals for ties to terrorism.
The Obama
administration has committed to bring at least 10,000 Syrian refugees onto
American soil in fiscal year 2016 by accelerating security screening procedures
from 18-24 months to around three months, according to sources who spoke to the
Washington Free Beacon.
Obama
administration officials told the Free Beacon that they remain committed to the
plan, despite warnings from the FBI and other law enforcement officials who say
the federal government is not equipped to properly vet these individuals within
that timeframe.
The
administration is committed to moving forward this year with a plan to resettle
10,000 Syrian refugees and 85,000 refugees overall, officials said.
Call
me constitutional, but I thought immigration
was Congress’ job, not that of the Executive Branch. Yes, yes,
that’s right, the Constitution is clear in Article 1, Section 9:
The Migration or
Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think
proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one
thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such
Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
In
other words, the Constitution provides for Congress to be the body that
determines whether the things that the Obama administration is doing can be
done and that would have to be done through legislation. The
Executive Branch is not authorized to make law, especially law concerning
immigration.
In
fact, a Federal
Court of Appeals has sided with Texas and 26
other states that are opposing Obama’s usurpation of immigration law, which
he has said
is “not smart” and “doesn’t make sense and even stated that we “might
as well abolish our immigration laws altogether.”
Some
in Congress are speaking up, but instead of pointing to the Constitution, they
are saying this is a security issue, which it is, but why they won’t deal with
the root, which is the crimes
of the Obama administration, is anyone’s guess. In fact, why do they
not deal with the clear and present national security issue, at 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue?
“We
know the 18- to 24-month vetting process for Syrian refugees has severe
vulnerabilities after FBI Director James Comey warned about the federal
government’s inability to thoroughly screen Syrian refugee applicants for
terrorism risk and after the Department of Homeland Security’s investigative
arm warned about ISIS’s capability to print fake Syrian passports for terrorist
infiltration,” Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) told the Free Beacon.
“Given
that the administration has not explained to the American people whether and
how it fixed these and other known vulnerabilities to terrorist infiltration,
it is highly irresponsible for the administration to reduce the 18- to 24-month
vetting process for Syrian refugees down to three months to meet its artificial
and ideologically-driven goal of bringing 10,000 Syrian refugees onto U.S. soil
by September,” Kirk added.
Rep.
Kirk put forward legislation recently that would impose enhanced screening
measures that would allegedly keep Islamic jihadists out of the refugee
program.
However, one has to ask exactly how the DC government would
determine jihadists from those who are not. Furthermore, is there an
actual piece of legislation that allows for bringing alleged Muslim refugees
into the US? I’m not aware of such
legislation. So, it appears to me that the cart is before the horse when
it comes to the Congress’ capitulation to the current administration.
Kirk
is being challenged by Rep. Tammy Duckworth for his congressional seat and his
campaign issued a recent statement regarding Duckworthy’s position on the
issue.
“Duckworth’s
plan to bring in 200,000 unsafely vetted Syrian refugees wasn’t considered safe
when the administration had two years to vet each refugee for terrorist
ties—it’s downright dangerous now that the vetting has been cut to just three
months.”
No comments:
Post a Comment