TERMINAL ILLNESS

Below is a link to a very disturbing video.

After watching it, I have come to the conclusion that this country has become terminally ill. 

http://conservativevideos.com/2013/12/senior-citizens-put-ignorant-young-people-shame-asked-inflation/

The United States is probably the only country EVER where a politician can get elected by telling everyone “we are living in the greatest country in the world.  Vote for me and help me change it”

Driver arrested for having empty compartment

No drugs necessary:

Driver arrested for having empty compartment

If you don’t believe this country is becoming a Police State, and if you don’t believe our rights and our freedoms are slowly but surely being taken away from us, the PLEASE READ THIS .

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/30/driver-arrested-for-having-empty-compartment-that-could-store-drugs/#ixzz2p4PBZ795

Perhaps the police officer should arrest his own wife for being a prostitute. Even thought she wasn't selling "it," she still hat the means and equipment to do so... including her own "hidden compartment."

GLOBAL WARMING UPDATE:

Global warming scientists forced to admit defeat... because of too much ice: Stranded Antarctic ship's crew will be rescued by helicopter

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2531159/Antarctic-crew-build-ice-helipad-help-rescuers.html#ixzz2p4LsOBkO
 

·  Chris Turney, a climate scientist and leader of the expedition, was going to document 'environmental changes' at the pole

·  In an interview he said he expected melting ice to play a part in expedition

·  MV Akademik Schokalskiy still stuck among thick ice sheet 1,500 nautical miles south of Hobart, the Tasmanian capital

·  Called for help at 5am Christmas morning after becoming submerged in ice

·  Australia's back-up ship, Aurora Australis could not break through

 

Here is some of what Edward Snowden leaked

The NSA is intercepting the Internet and Even the U.S. Mail Service.
This is some of what Edward Snowden leaked that has the government so upset.  This is a 3 part series.   
Here are links to all three parts.

PART 1: NSA HACKING UNIT   http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-nsa-uses-powerful-toolbox-in-effort-to-spy-on-global-networks-a-940969.html

PART 2: TARGETING MEXICO   http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-nsa-uses-powerful-toolbox-in-effort-to-spy-on-global-networks-a-940969-2.html

PART 3: NSA’S SHADOW NETWORK   http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-nsa-uses-powerful-toolbox-in-effort-to-spy-on-global-networks-a-940969-3.html

It has now been revealed that NSA is bugging every new computer sold.
So if you got a new computer recently, it was probubaly already bugged when you brought it home.
 

Fast & Furious Bombshell

FBI Implicated in Death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry

Operation Fast & Furious, the U.S. government’s failed sting operation to run guns to Mexican drug cartels, has a major new development. According to ATF whistleblower John Dodson, the FBI was involved in the drug snatch operation that led to the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

READ MORE HERE:   http://www.ijreview.com/2013/12/104502-fast-furious-bombshell-fbi-involved-death-border-patrol-agent-brian-terry/

And we kicked Nixon out of office for merely reading the Democrats mail!

ObamaCare update

WELCOME TO THE FINE PRINT IN OBAMACARE

Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.

** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an
individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic
fund transfers from those accounts.

** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government)
for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations
(such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -
ACORN).

** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.

** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

 HAPPY NEW YEAR…That’s when it takes effect.

Homo-Phobia and/or Homophobic

All the recent discussions about Duck Dynasty and Phil Robertson, has prompted me to ask, “What exactly is homophobia”.

Some say it’s just a “made up word”.  Well, technically it’s not a “made up” word; however, todays commonly accepted meaning is a “made up” meaning.

Let’s examine the compound word by breaking it down into it’s two parts.

Phobia is simple enough, it means; an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation (Merriam Webster Dictionary-2013)   Therefore, homophobic actually means the fear of “HOMO”.

The meaning of the compound word “homophobia “depends on which definition of “homo” you wish to use.

The first definition of “HOMO” is: any of a genus of hominids that includes modern humans (homo sapiens) and several extinct species (as homo erectus and homo habilus).  In which case; homophobic would be the fear of all hominids. That includes modern humans and several now extinct ancestral species.  OK, there are a few humans you may fear.  Mike Tyson comes to mind, unless you want your ear bitten off..

The second definition of “HOMO” is: "the same", in which case; homophobic would be the fear of everything that is the same.  Makes no sense at all.

The third definition of “HOMO” is: a prefix that may be used in organic chemistry's trivial names to indicate a next higher straight chain homolog, i.e., one noncyclic carbon more (and similarly "dihomo-" meaning two noncyclic carbons more) – examples include: Homochlorclizine, and Homovanillc acid.

In which case…Oh well, I think you get my point…

In my opinion, homosexual people really need to come up with a better word to describe people who do not agree with their lifestyle.  Here are a couple of suggestions; how about “straight” or maybe “Christian”.

If you challenge my use of the word “Christian”, I refer you to the following Christian scriptures.

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:13

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. Romans 1: 24, 25, 26, 27.

The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. Deuteronomy 22:5.

Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Jude 7

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind. 1 Corinthians 6: 9.

Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine. 1 Timothy 1:9,10.

And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Lev 20: 15, 16.

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion. Leviticus 18: 22, 23.

By their heroes shall you know them.

HERE IS A VERY GOOD ARTICLE BY PAT BUCHANAN 

Mandela, Churchill and the War for the Future
By Patrick J. Buchanan

By their heroes shall you know them.

In his eulogy, President Obama put Nelson Mandela in the company of three other heroes: Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Abraham Lincoln.

What did these men have in common? Three were assassinated, and all four are icons of resistance to white rule over peoples of color.

Lincoln waged the bloodiest war in American history that ended slavery. Gandhi advanced the end of British rule in India. King led the civil rights struggle that buried Jim Crow. Mandela was the leader of the revolution that overthrew apartheid.

Obama's heroes testify to his belief that the great moral struggle of the age is the struggle for racial equality.

For the neocons, the greatest man was Winston Churchill, because he stood up, almost alone, to the great evil of the age -- Nazism.

Thus, to neocons, Munich was the great betrayal because it was there that Neville Chamberlain, rather than defy Hitler, agreed to the return of the Sudeten Germans to German rule. [To the Old Right, Yalta, where Churchill and FDR ceded Eastern Europe to Stalin, a monster as evil and more menacing than Hitler, was the greatest betrayal.]

But what did Churchill think of Obama's hero Gandhi?

"It is alarming and nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi, a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a type well known in the east, striding half naked up the steps of the Viceregal Palace ... to parlay on equal terms with the representative of the Emperor-King."

What did Churchill think of ending Western white rule of peoples of color? Here he is in 1937:

"I do not admit ... that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia ... by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race ... has come in and taken its place."

Here is Churchill during World War II:

"I have not become the King's first minister in order to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire."

In short, Dunkirk defiance aside, Churchill's convictions about the superiority of some races and civilizations, and their inherent right to rule what Kipling called "the lesser breeds without the law," was and is the antithesis of what Obama believes.

Any wonder Obama shipped that bust of Churchill that "W" kept in the Oval Office back to the British embassy. Any surprise Obama failed to show up at the funeral of Margaret Thatcher, a Churchillian who sent the fleet to retake the Falkland Islands from Argentina.

The point: Obama's vision of an ideal world and Churchill's are irreconcilable.
Second, not only is Churchill dead, his empire is dead, his world is dead, and his ideas on superior races and civilizations would be censured and censored if spoken in any international forum.

We are in Obama's world now. It is a world where not only are all races, religions and civilizations equal, but within nations the greater the diversity of races, religions, cultures and ethnic groups the better.

And not only should all have equal rights, but more equal rewards.

Inequality equals injustice. Income inequality is the new enemy.

But though Obama's world is today, it is looking less like tomorrow.

Across the Middle East and Africa, Islamists are murdering and persecuting Christians as they do not regard Christianity as equal.

Ethnonationalism unites Chinese against Tibetans and Uighurs and propels a confrontation with the Japanese who have never been forgiven for the Rape of Nanking.

Vladimir Putin is in the crosshairs of Western secularists for seeking to revive and restore Orthodox Christianity and its moral precepts to primacy in Russian law, which likely means no Gay Pride parades in Red Square any time soon.

In a Christmas card to this writer, the Washington Post's Harold Meyerson brings up my late father's support of Spain's Gen. Francisco Franco -- to reveal the son's suspect motives.

In a civil war from 1936-1939, Franco ran off a Christophobic regime of Socialists, Stalinists and Trotskyists as their comrades of the Abraham Lincoln Battalion got waxed at Jarama River and ended up on the Attorney General's List of Subversive Organizations.

Sorry about that, Harold.

Across Europe, globalism and transnationalism, as represented by the eurozone and EU, seem in retreat, as nationalism is resurgent. Now it is the UKIP, a new British independence party, which seeks to secede from the EU that is surging -- at the expense of the Tories.

Let France be France! Let Britain be Britain! Let Scotland be Scotland! These are the cries coming from the hearts of Europeans rejecting mass immigration and the cacophonous madness of multiculturalism.

All men may be equal in rights. But most prefer their own faith, country, culture, civilization, and kind. They cherish and wish to maintain their own unique and separate identities. They do not want to disappear into some great amalgam of the New World Order.

Whether globalism or nationalism prevails, the big battle is coming.

SOURCE: http://buchanan.org/blog/mandela-churchill-war-future-6141

Get Pats Books...

                  ...Signed by Pat Buchanan!

http://buchanan.org/blog/pjb-shop

Good article from TOWNHALL.COM

Obama and DC Bureaucrats Follow in the Steps of King George

Michael Schaus | Dec 26, 2013

Right around eight a.m. in the morning, two hundred thirty seven years ago, George Washington and the Continental Army reached the outskirts of Trenton, New Jersey. Much like today, no-one wanted to go to New Jersey, but were forced by circumstances to make the arduous trek. Washington’s force of 2,400 men surprised, and ultimately defeated, the 1,400 Hessian mercenaries who were fighting on behalf of the British Crown. A much needed win was tallied under the Patriot’s side of the scoreboard, emboldening the Continental Army and our quest for freedom. 

Washington had lead his men through the icy waters of the Delaware and into an unforgiving snow storm on the evening of Christmas in 1776. (Kinda makes your family Christmas yesterday look like a picnic… Right?) The Hessians, who had greatly underestimated the Continental Army’s capabilities, was unaware and still groggy from an evening of Christmas festivities. (Way to go George: Sneak up on those crafty Germans when they’re hung-over… Churchill, take note.) 

By the end of the battle at Trenton, four Americans had lost their lives. Over a thousand Hessians were captured. And while Washington was unable to hold onto the town (he had no artillery), the victory bore tremendous significance for the freedom of the colonies. In New Jersey, on December 26^th in the year 1776, George Washington and his men cemented the concept of American exceptionalism and dedication to freedom. 

The historical event is worth a few minutes of recollection as we trudge toward 2014 with an increasingly apparent devolution of freedom in America. After all, in the days of our founding, a simple tax on our breakfast beverage resulted in massive protests in Boston Harbor – and ultimately a few gunshots. Our founders were tired of being ruled by a body of “representatives” hundreds of miles away. They were fed up with the dictatorial nature of King George’s executive action, and disregard for individual property rights. Imagine living in a land where one man in the executive branch could unilaterally alter law… It’s not that hard to imagine, is it? 

Sure, King George never shoved universal healthcare down the throats of our Patriot founders; but he did enact taxes, regulation, and tariffs, with little more than a stroke of a pen. (No word, yet, on how often he decided to play golf.) 

And while many things have changed since 1776 (although the government’s inability to build a website has clearly remained unchanged in 200 plus years) there are many similarities in politics, societal concerns, and the struggle for liberty. The latter half of the 18^th century saw some incredible shifts in how the world functioned, and how commerce commenced within the new world. As much as anything else, it was the changing times that propelled American patriots to a victory over the powerful British Empire. 

The lesson should not be lost on ardent supporters of freedom in the 21^st century. Freedom, and the cause of Liberty, will never be extinguished entirely, as is evidenced by Washington’s under-dog victory against a group of drunken mercenaries in New Jersey. And while freedoms may seem in jeopardy on a regular basis today, the sacrifices and tenacity of Washington and his men have allowed us to live in a world where freedom is no longer a farfetched concept. In fact, thanks to the ragged farmers and laborers who overthrew a hung-over force of Hessian mercenaries, we now live in a world where freedom and liberty are still experienced in relative abundance.

The bad news, on this anniversary of the battle of Trenton, is that many of us are still regulated and taxed by unaccountable officials a world away from where we live. Having bureaucrats in DC decide to regulate or tax based on other bureaucrat’s recommendations, after all, is not that different than the British Crown implementing law without the consent of the governed. 

The good news, however, is that Americans still seem largely inclined toward rejecting centralized power, dictatorial governance, and ruling-class-elitism. Citizens of our great nation, for example, almost universally despise congress. Even liberals consider the label “congressman” to be a pejorative in most cases. While much of Obama’s recent drop in public polls can be attributed to his outright lies on Obamacare, a sizeable portion of his PR problem is likely tied to his elitist (and unconstitutional) decision to unilaterally tinker with the law. (After all, what confidence can the American people place in government, when one man is capable of altering law without the consent of the governed?) 

Of course, it’s also a bonus that making a trip to New Jersey is not a requisite to fighting for freedom on this December 27^th.

Four stories in Today's Headlines

Wall Street adviser recommends guns, ammo for protection in collapse

READ STORY HERE:  http://washingtonexaminer.com/be-prepared-wall-street-advisor-recommends-guns-ammo-for-protection-in-collapse/article/2541205

Obama Kills the 110 Year Old Civilian Marksmanship Program with Executive Order

READ MORE HERE:  http://info-brodcast.blogspot.com/2013/10/obama-kills-110-year-old-civilian.html

New Proposed IRS Rules Would Authorize Targeting Conservatives Critical of White House
Read more at http://visiontoamerica.com/16490/new-proposed-irs-rules-would-authorize-targeting-conservatives-critical-of-wh/#lwmJk2i0uTPPwEcf.99

Shoppers Stock Up On Rifles, Shotguns Before California Long Gun Registry Begins

READ STORY HERE: http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/12/27/shoppers-stock-up-on-rifles-shotguns-before-california-long-gun-registry-begins/

I can see a connection between these four stories in today’s headlines…Can you?

Cruciphobia

Cruciphobia at Mt. Soledad:

The Cross the Left Can't Bear

The historic 43-foot cross has stood atop Mount Soledad on public land since 1954.  The Mount Soledad Memorial Association erected the monument to commemorate the sacrifice of American soldiers who died in the Korean War, World War I and World War II.  The cross has long carried meaning for the city's residents far beyond religious symbolism.  "It's a symbol of coming of age and of remembrance," Pastor Mark Slomka of the Mount Soledad Presbyterian Church said years ago when the case erupted. The San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board explained that the cross is "much like the Mission San Diego de Alcala and the cross at Presidio Park, both of which also are rooted in Christianity but have come to signify the birth of San Diego."

READ STORY HERE:  http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2013/12/25/cruciphobia-at-mt-soledad-the-cross-the-left-cant-bear-n1768241/page/full

Joe the Plumber on “DUCK DYNASTY”

A&E is flooding damage control with lies about Phil Robertson
Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2013/12/ae-flooding-damage-control-lies-phil-robertson/#01ziKbWBdBTi0Jha.99

Eyewitness to Hitler Warns Americans

Eyewitness to Hitler Warns Americans: “Keep your guns.

Keep your guns and buy more guns.

When Katie Worthman was a little girl in Austria, she witnessed firsthand Adolph Hitler’s rise to power and the Soviet communist occupation that followed.  She also witnessed, for decades, the distortions of the media when it came to the reporting of the events.

From her eyewitness perspective, Worthman said that the whole thing didn’t happen overnight, in a brutal attack, like the media portrays it, but rather, it evolved into a dictatorship gradually, over a period of a few years.  Hitler didn’t come across as someone evil, to be feared, initially.  ”In the beginning, Hitler didn’t look like, or talk like a monster at all. He talked like an American politician.”

Here are some things that occurred in Austria, according to Worthman, that just might look familiar to Americans:

• Hitler was elected with 98% of the vote.
• Hitler destroyed the existing medical system when he brought a national healthcare plan into being.
• First, people were forced to register their guns to cut down on crime.
• Then they were forced to turn them in or risk capital punishment for keeping them.

Worthman’s eyewitness account is eerily reminiscent of what we can see going on in the United States today.

“In 1938, the media reported that Hitler rode into Austria with tanks and guns and took us over. Not true at all,” she says. “The Austrian people elected Hitler by 98% of the vote by means of the ballot box. Now you might ask how could a Christian nation… elect a monster like Hitler. The truth is at the beginning Hitler didn’t look like or talk like a monster at all. He talked like an American politician.<

“We also had gun registration. All the Austrian people… had guns. But the government said, ‘the guns are very dangerous. Children are playing with guns. Hunting accidents happen and we really have to have total controlled safety. And we had criminals again. And the only way that we can trace the criminal was by the serial number of the gun.’

“So we dutifully went to the police station and we registered our guns. Not long after they said, ‘No, it didn’t help. The only way that we won’t have accidents and crimes [is] you bring the guns to the police station and then we don’t have any crimes anymore and any accidents. And if you don’t do that: capital punishment.’

“When the people fear the government, that’s tyranny. But when the government fears the people… that’s liberty. Keep your guns. Keep your guns and buy more guns.”

Now 84, Katie Worthman is warning America, her adopted country, in the hopes that history does not repeat itself. Watch her powerful presentation below.  If you don’t want to go buy more ammo after that, then you aren’t paying attention.

WATCH THE VIDEO HERE:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-yAv4gbqs

DON’T LET HISTORY REPEAT IT’S SELF

A QUICK CHANGE OF HEART…

1.         Cracker Barrel Bans Duck Dynasty

2.         Huckabee Bans Cracker Barrel

3.         Cracker Barrel Quickly Un-bans Duck Dynasty

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/3752/huckabee-bans-cracker-barrel-cracker-barrel-un-bans-duck-dynasty/#fGZjylTsSesTXLaK.99

I LIKE MICK 

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/cracker-barrel-backtrack-duck-back-menu

  

I guess it would be impolite to say “I told you so”

How's that gun-free zone working out for Starbucks?

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/12/hows_that_gun-free_zone_working_out_for_starbucks.html#ixzz2oJfONs6X

                           
WELL, who could’ve seen that coming?

First Amendment Rights are only For Non-Christians

WHY are First Amendment Rights only For Non-Christians?

I don’t know how many people actually read this blog, and I don’t know if anyone has ever read my profile, but here is an excerpt from my profile which pertains to today’s post:  I believe in freedom of religion for everyone… I am a pro-life Christian but I do not try to push my religious beliefs on others... As for "same sex marriage", I don't care one way or the other as long as no church or member of the clergy is ever required to perform one against their will...

Well, a lot has happened since I wrote that profile.  Nothing has changed about me or my beliefs, but much has changed about what is happening in this country.  

 

For starters; the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that wedding photographers could not refuse to photograph gay ceremonies.   The court rejected each of photographer Elaine Huguenin's arguments, particularly one in which Huguenin had argued that her refusal did not discriminate against same-sex customers.  She argued that she would happily photograph gay customers, but not in a context that seemed to endorse same-sex marriage. Likewise, she said, she wouldn't shoot heterosexuals in a context that endorsed same-sex marriage.

The court rejected any legal differentiation between homosexuality and homosexual conduct.

"The difficulty in distinguishing between status and conduct in the context of sexual orientation discrimination is that people may base their judgment about an individual's sexual orientation on the individual's conduct," wrote Justice Edward Chávez. "To allow discrimination based on conduct so closely correlated with sexual orientation would severely undermine the purpose of the NMHRA."

READ MORE HERE:  http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2013/august/nm-supreme-court-photographers-cant-refuse-gay-weddings.html

Then, there’s the case in In Colorado where a Christian baker is paying dearly for denying homosexuals a “wedding” cake.  Denver baker Jack Phillips refused to bake a cake for a homosexual “wedding” in 2012, and was subsequently sued for discrimination.   He cited his First Amendment right to freedom of religion, and his belief that marriage is between a man and a woman.  

The Colorado courts found Mr. Phillips has no claim to exercise his First Amendment rights.  Another judge has ruled homosexuals have a right not to be offended that supersedes First Amendment religious rights.   “WHAT?”

 

In other words, Christians should not expect to be granted First Amendment Rights in cases such as this.  There is no freedom of religion for Christians. To deny a homosexual a cake for a “wedding” is a violation of their civil rights. 

I’m not sure if any member of the clergy has been forced to perform a same sex marriage yet or not, but based on all these recent court rulings, they no longer have a choice. 

Judge Robert Spencer ruled that Jack Phillips must bake cakes for same sex couples, and the only alternative to be to close his business.  Otherwise, he would face fines, and possible jail time.  The bottom line is “Christians no longer have the right to express their First Amendment beliefs, period. 

Don’t expect any help from the ACLU.   They “argued that while the government had the right to force a Christian to use his artistic talents to design a homosexual wedding cake, the standard should not be applied to other groups – such as asking a Muslim baker to make a cake criticizing his faith.”  “WHAT?”  The courts AND the ACLU only support non-Christians.   How is this not the ultimate double standard? 

That shouldn’t surprise me; after all, the ACLU is firmly aligned with the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is a Muslim Brotherhood front group.  

According to the Counter Jihad Report, on November 12, 2013, the ACLU honored CAIR with the Civil Libertarian Award.  The ACLU is devoted to the protection of Islam, gay rights, and the complete destruction of Christianity. It’s a collective effort on all fronts.

The ACLU is in full support of both Islam and homosexuals, in spite of the fact that the Quran specifies death for homosexuality.  Logically it makes no sense. But hardly anything does these days.

I had intended to include a few paragraphs on the “duck dynasty controversy”, but people will not read a post if it’s to long.  If fact, I doubt that anyone read past the third or forth paragraph.

 .

THE NEW OBAMACARE COMMERCIAL

PIERS MORGAN WILL LOVE THE NEW OBAMACARE COMMERCIAL

READ MORE HERE:   http://visiontoamerica.com/16460/half-naked-gays-spread-obamacare-enrollment-message-in-new-commercial/

MORE ABOUT The Duck Dynasty Controversey

Walmart SELLS OUT of Duck Dynasty merchandise as fans flock to support Phil

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2527204/Duck-Dynastys-multi-million-payday-Their-400m-empire-flourishes-amid-scandal-fans-flock-support-Phil-Robertson-Walmart-sells-merchandise.html#ixzz2o95j0Zs6
 

The Duck Dynasty Controversy

WHEN THEY CAME FOR PHIL ROBERTSON

If you think this whole “duck dynasty” controversy is trivial and doesn’t matter, please go to this web site and read this post.  http://cbmw.org/public-square/marriage-public-square/when-they-came-for-phil-robertson-i-was-not-a-duck-commander-so/

UPDATE ON "Fake Birth Certificate"

Mysterious Death Related to Obama’s Fake Birth Certificate

Read more at http://victoriajackson.com/10252/mysterious-death-related-obamas-fake-birth-certificate#YsDBSioU87or8cA8.99

I smell a cover-up conspiracy.

Phill Robertson update

A&E May be In Violation of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 by Suspending Phil Robertson

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]
(a) Employer practices
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

- See more at: http://www.libertynews.com/2013/12/breaking-is-ae-in-violation-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964-by-suspending-phil-robertson/#sthash.my6Cbxps.dpuf

READ MORE HERE:  http://www.libertynews.com/2013/12/breaking-is-ae-in-violation-of-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964-by-suspending-phil-robertson/

GET THE LEAD OUT

'Green Bullets' Overtaking Lead Thanks to EPA, State Regs, Military

READ MORE HERE:  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/18/Green-Bullets-Overtaking-Lead-Bullets-Thanks-To-EPA-State-Regs-Military

Lead bullets are on the way out.  EVEN FOR THE MILITARY.

Obamacare is a disaster.

This is not what Obama and the Democrats promised the American people.

Over five million people have received cancellation letters stating that they are being kicked off of their insurance because it does not meet the minimal requirements under the Affordable Care Act. Let that sink in for a bit… over 5 million people are being kicked off of their insurance because their old plans don’t offer maternity, dental, and eye coverage. Elderly cancer patients are being kicked off of their insurance because their coverage doesn’t provide maternity or pediatric care. It doesn’t matter that they are too old to have children. They are just one example of people who are being kicked off their coverage and forced to buy more expensive insurance plans for coverage they don’t need! 

After those 5 million Americans being kicked off their insurance, what do we have to show for it? A whopping 364,000 people have “enrolled” in Obamacare. This statistic means absolutely nothing because it doesn’t take into account how many people have actually paid to be covered under Obamacare. 

As the Obama administration celebrates this 364k enrollment figure, they are conveniently leaving out the fact that less than half of all people enrolled have actually paid for insurance yet. Experts estimate that only 150,000 people have actually put in their credit cards and purchased health insurance through the Federal exchange. I am sure that number would be higher if the Obama administration actually bothered to build the part of the website that enables you to pay for insurance.

That’s right, as we’ve told you in the past, the Obama administration forgot to even build the 40% of the website that is devoted to processing payments. So even if you are able to sign on to the website and you pick a more expensive healthcare that you can stomach, you won’t even be able to pay for it online! 

So President Obama has given us healthcare that NONE of us want, at a price that NONE of us can afford, and even if we wanted to, we CAN’T physically purchase it! 

Even if the administration is able to fix the website to allow people to purchase their insurance, there is no way people will be covered by January 1st… And Obama knows this! Obama has “requested” that insurance companies and doctors ignore the fact that people haven’t paid for their coverage and insure them anyway. 

Wait… What? People haven’t paid for their insurance and Obama actually expects insurance companies to just pay people’s medical expenses out of pocket, without any guarantee of being paid back? 

Well, just this week, the insurance companies respectfully told the President that under no circumstances would they provide medical coverage for people who hadn’t paid for it. And you can’t blame the insurance companies for this. It isn’t their fault that the Obamacare rollout has been such a train wreck. Now we are faced with the reality that not only will millions of people enter 2014 without health insurance thanks to Obamacare, but even those who chose an alternative plan won’t receive coverage because there was no way for them to physically pay for it in time! 

It is important to know that Obamacare is doomed to fail in the short-term, but the law will fail even if the administration gets its act together. That’s because the entire system is based on the assumption that there will be enough young and healthy Americans enrolled to pay for the medical coverage of older and sicker enrollees. Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like that is ever going to happen. 

If you think about the health insurance marketplace as a pyramid, the ideal situation would be to have a young and healthy foundation to support the few sick people who constantly need coverage. 

However the enrollment and polling data suggests that Obamacare is creating the exact opposite. As more and more sick and elderly people enroll in the Affordable Care Act, there aren’t enough healthy people enrolling to be able to keep premiums low. As it is, the introduction of new enrollees with pre-existing conditions into the insurance pools is already estimated to increase the average American’s insurance premiums by 33%! That’s right… instead of the $2,500 reduction that President Obama promised, we are actually slated to see our yearly insurance premiums increase by $2,500. The President lied to you. Are you just going to sit back and watch Obamacare tank the U.S. economy? 

But all this is still assuming that young and healthy people will be enrolling in Obamacare. And if recent polling is any indication, the vast majority of young Americans have absolutely no plan to overpay for health insurance under Obamacare… 

A recent Harvard University poll has found that only 29% of young Americans, ages 18-29, have any plans to enroll in the Obamacare exchanges. Only 10% of respondents said that they would definitely be enrolling, while 19% responded that they would probably enroll in the healthcare exchanges. These are abysmal numbers. 

It’s no wonder that the Obama administration has reached out to Hollywood to try and sell this train wreck legislation to America’s youth. 

But it has come to the point where we must open our eyes and recognize that no amount of money or willpower is going to make this flawed healthcare law work. The warning signs are there. If we continue down this path, we will eventually come to the point where there is no turning back. 

The 2014 midterm elections will be a referendum on this horrible law and if the public polling numbers are to be believed, the vast majority of Americans want this healthcare law repealed. The American people now know what we knew all along: The math just doesn’t add up and President Obama has lied to us from the beginning! 

Unfortunately, while the public is outraged over Obamacare, we cannot rely on them to bring about the change we need. Everyone is watching this healthcare law crumble and saying to themselves, “I’m sure someone else will do something about it.” 

Only you can force Congress to see the writing on the wall. Obamacare will fail and every Representative and Senator who refused to act will lose their reelection. Threatening their job security is the only language that these career politicians understand! 

Imagine if everyone simultaneously faxed Congress to smack some sense into them! Together we will overwhelm Congress with faxes to the point where they cannot ignore us anymore!