Friday, January 25, 2013

GUN BAN NONSENCE



President Obama has announced 23 executive actions relating to gun control, whether Congress acts or not.  Included in those plans is a directive to the Centers for Disease Control to take your tax dollars and spend it on anti-gun propaganda, likening gun violence to a disease or a public health issue.  It is the same thing he has done with Obamacare propaganda.  Obama is treating our Bill of Rights like a plague. 

Democrats in Congress are willing to help Obama destroy our Second Amendment rights.      Senator Dianne Feinstein has unveiled her gun control legislation that I have mentioned before.  Her actual proposal is much more severe than I expected, and it shows how far the Democrats are willing to go to wipe out our right to bear arms.


Feinstein wants to expand the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 and include rifles, handguns and shotguns. She would require grandfathered weapons to be entered into a national gun registry. Magazines would be limited to ten rounds.

And she would make it illegal to have just one cosmetic feature on a gun for it to be considered an assault weapon.

The Feinstein Gun Ban would:
*** Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically named rifles, shotguns and handguns!
*** Ban the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable magazine and at least one "military characteristic" -- which could mean just about anything that makes a gun "look scary;"
*** Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of magazines holding more than 10 rounds;
*** Force owners of ALL "grandfathered" weapons to undergo an intrusive background check and fingerprinting -- treating law-abiding citizens like criminals;
*** Force owners of ALL "grandfathered" weapons to federally register their guns after obtaining a permission slip from local law enforcement showing their guns are not in violation of state or local law.

That’s right. If you own a $10 magazine that’s more than 10 rounds, you’ll have to register it with the BATFE in their National Firearms Registry.

The ban on "transfers" means you and I can forget about ever handing down one of these guns to our kids and grandkids.

Worse, it could mean widows become instant felons if their husbands owned one of these banned magazines or firearms!

And make no mistake, the gun-grabbers’ TRUE motives behind gun registration is always the same -- outright gun CONFISCATION, and to do that they must first register every gun and gun owner.

Then Senator Feinstein will be able to achieve her publicly stated goal:

"Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in."

I have three points I want to make:

FIRST POINT… Increasing gun sales in America in recent years has led to lower crime rates.
The same is true all over the world.   Studies show countries with low rates of civilian firearms ownership are the most violent. Countries with high rates of civilian firearms ownership are the safest.   Just look to nearby Mexico if you want to see an example of the gun-grabbers’ idea of utopia. Effectively ruled by violent drug gangs in many areas, Mexico is a cesspool of rape, violence and murder.

SECOND POINT… The mainstream media has admitted no assault weapons were used in the attack at Sandy Hook.   So, what’s the point of banning everything that is (in your mind) an assault weapon?

THIRD POINT… Just what the hall is an assault weapon?
I believe by military the definition, an assault rifle first and foremost must be fully automatic.  Using that definition, they have been illegal for civilians to own every since 1935 unless they have been disabled.

Anything that is used to assault another person can be considered an assault weapon and anything that is used to defend your self is without question, a DEFENSIVE weapon.   If someone stabs another person with a butter knife, that's an "assault weapon". Using that term is laughable to describe any weapon.  Any object used in an assault, is an "assault weapon" by definition, even if it's a rock. 
Liberals are very simple minded, they need a catch term to misrepresent these rifles as assault rifles.   The terms “assault rifle” and “assault weapon” are meaningless terms used by the anti-gun politicians to scare the uneducated (on rifles) masses.   They are using the assault weapon catch phrase because it creates scary visualizations of a madman machine gunning innocent people down.

FACT: "Assault Hammers" were used 1.53 times more than rifles to murder 496 people in 2011; (which is why I'm putting trigger locks on all of my assault hammers.)

Strangely enough the weapon that killed more people than any other only carries 5 rounds. 
The 98K Mauser is that weapon.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karabiner_98k








1 comment:

  1. Obama and his minions got away with Operation Fast and Furious. They got away with Benghazi and Libya. They got away with Solyndra, “Government” Motors and the host of scandals and crimes that have defined Obama’s tenure.
    But did they really think they would get away with a frontal assault on a group of people who not only recognize the authority of the Constitution, but are willing to defend it by precisely the means it affords them?
    What’s more, Obama’s attempts to implement his fascist vision have backfired. Gun sales have gone through the roof. Some magazine manufacturers have suspended the acceptance of new orders in order to deal with a mounting backlog. Ammunition is selling faster than stores can put it on the shelves. Don’t believe me? Just try to find a box of ammo for your 9mm.

    ReplyDelete