Who has killed more children

Who has killed more children, Adam Lanza or Barack Obama?
You probably think this is about abortion because this year is the 40^th anniversary of Roe v Wade.  Well, that’s a good point considering Obama’s long history of supporting late term abortion and partial birth abortion.  But this is about something else entirely.

The president himself has directly killed about 176 children in Pakistan by the use of CIA drones.  These drones have been dispatched by him, and him alone -- not pursuant to any congressional declaration of war.  At least two of these murdered children were Americans.  But since the cameras were kept away, and since all of this takes place 10,000 miles from America, and since the survivors are legally and politically helpless, no one here hears the Pakistani children's cries of pain and anguish.

One of the reasons we have the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms is to enable us to resist a drone sent to the path of our children by shooting it down, no matter who sent it.  But you can't stop a drone with a BB gun.  Hence the need for serious firepower in the hands of ordinary Americans -- to give tyrants pause and to stop tyrants when they don't pause.  The president wants to use Lanza's horrific slaughter of 20 babies in a public school in Connecticut with a stolen gun as an excuse to restrict the freedoms of all law-abiding gun-owning Americans, any one of whom would have stopped Lanza in a heartbeat with a lawful gun, before the police could, had they been in that school.

Does a president with blood on his hands have any moral standing to infringe upon the natural right to self-defense of those whose hands are clean?  Would you sacrifice your liberty to defend yourself and your children so that the government can kill whom it pleases?

If you agree with what I have written in this post, please forward the link to this post to everyone you know.  If you do not agree, then just poke your head back into the sand and forget about it.