Carly Fiorina may have been the first
woman to lead a Fortune 50 business, but she turned out to be just as bad at it
as Barack Obama has been at running the country. Despite the spin she tries to put in, Carly
Fiorina was a disaster for Hewlett Packard.
Fiorina’s story is that she stormed into HP, turned the
company around and was unceremoniously fired because she challenged the status
quo. In actuality, she insisted on a controversial merger with Compaq, got her
way and it decimated the company. Fiorina loves to talk about HP’s increase in
raw numbers, but if two large computer companies merge, it’s almost a given
that the revenue and the number of patents produced by both companies combined
are going to increase.
What didn’t
increase was HP’s stock price. It dropped from $55 a share when Fiorina took over to a little less than
$20 a share under her leadership. There is a reason Fiorina shows up
on lists of the Worst CEOs Of All Time (See here, here, here, and here among others) and it’s not because the
whole business world is engaged in some kind of conspiracy to portray her as an
incompetent.
Let me also add that it’s not fair that Democrats will
attack her for firing 30,000 workers because unfortunately, that just comes
with the territory when you’re a CEO sometimes. However, if you think it
wouldn’t be incredibly effective to point out that Fiorina fired 30,000
workers, tanked the price of the company’s stock, damaged Hewlett Packard so
badly that it has yet to recover and STILL walked away with 100 million dollars
for being one of the worst CEOs of all time, you’re kidding yourself. For all
of his flaws, Mitt Romney was a gifted businessman and the Democrats managed to
falsely portray him as a heartless, greedy monster for doing far less than that
at Bain Capital.
If Carly Fiorina were to say that she’d run America like
she ran Hewlett Packard, it could be taken as a direct threat against the
country. So, what else does she have to offer as a candidate?
Oh, right! She’s supposedly a grassroots conservative
outsider! Yeah, well about that….
Fiorina has run for office before. During the Tea Party
tidal wave of 2010, there seemed to be an outside chance that Republicans might
be able to knock off Barbra Boxer in California. Granted, it’s California, so
it was always going to be a heavy lift, but after Scott Brown had won earlier
in the year in Massachusetts, it didn’t seem impossible that a Republican could
pull it off.
So, as we have often seen in these last few years, a
conservative grassroots candidate squared off with a moderate candidate backed
by the establishment. The grassroots conservative candidate was Chuck DeVore
and the establishment candidate was Carly Fiorina. Almost every big name
conservative except for Sarah Palin lined up behind DeVore (and I love Sarah,
but if Fiorina had been a man, there’s not a chance in the world she would have
gotten that endorsement.
That’s why Sarah had to deal with a big backlash from her own fans over backing Fiorina).
On the other hand, the NRSC, John McCain and Lindsey Graham were all supporting
Fiorina. Interesting question: When have John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the
NRSC EVER backed a conservative candidate over a moderate in a competitive
race? Yes, that’s right; they don’t do that. Ever.
After beating DeVore by outspending him more than 3-to1, Fiorina
went toe-to-toe with charisma-free Senator Barbara Boxer and got her brains
beaten in. Surprise, surprise -- Fiorina’s disastrous run at Hewlett Packard
turned out to be an anchor around her neck and the fact that she was such a
terrible politician that she signed off on bizarre garbage like the Demon
Sheep ad (IT APPEARS at 2:26) certainly didn’t help. In a year when
Republicans picked up 6 Senate seats, Boxer waltzed to a 10 point victory over
Fiorina.
So, Fiorina’s a failed CEO and it would be more accurate
to call her an “establishment favorite” than an outsider, but at least she’s a
hardcore conservative, right? Well….not so much. Here’s Redstate on Carly Fiorina back in 2010.
From her praise of Jesse Jackson, to her playing the race
and gender cards against DeVore, to her support for the Wall Street bailouts,
to her qualified support for the Obama stimulus, to her past support for
taxation of sales on the Internet, to her waffling on immigration, to her
support for Sonia Sotomayor, to her Master’s thesis advocating greater federal
control of local education, to her past support for weakening California’s
Proposition 13, to her statement to the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board
that Roe v. Wade is “a decided issue,” Carly Fiorina’s oft-repeated claim to be
a “lifelong conservative” was only plausible in the universe of NRSC staffers
who recruited her in the first place.
...She endorsed Federal funding of embryonic stem-cell
research for “extra” embyros.
She endorsed the California DREAM Act, which grants
in-state tuition to illegal immigrants.
She refused to endorse California’s Proposition 23, which
suspends the job-killing AB 32 climate-change law.
Fiorina also strongly supported Marco Rubio’s amnesty
plan that even he claims not to back anymore, endorsed cap & trade and
attacked Ted Cruz for being willing to shut down the government to stop
Obamacare.
How do you trust Fiorina on
immigration, small government issues, taxes, pro-life issues, global
warming or to even try to kill Obamacare after that?
Although it’s
very difficult to predict what’s going to happen in a primary season as crazy
as this one has been, the difference between what people THINK Fiorina is and
what she ACTUALLY is, is so great that we can hazard one guess: Carly Fiorina
is going to follow the 2012 pattern. People will initially get excited about
her, find out what her record really looks like and then she’ll quickly
implode.
No comments:
Post a Comment