Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Obama's Equal Pay Executive Order is Ridiculous



Stats behind Obama's Equal Pay Executive Order

WATCH THESE TWO GUYS TELL IT LIKE IT IS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hELTuUBiqSs

OK, My first point: If women are paid 77% of what men are paid in a capitalistic market based system of supply and demand, profit and loss, how is it that there are any men employed at all?  All astute businessmen would be hiring women, and only women, as they can cut their labor costs by 23% by doing so.  If they could improve their bottom line by 23%, they would most definitely be doing it.

My second point:  Charles Krauthammer is right.  A lot more men work at dangerous jobs than do women, and dangerous jobs HAVE to pay more because people don’t risk life and limb without compensation.

My third point: Call me a sexist if you will, but the simple truth is, there are SOME jobs that pay quite well that MOST women do not have the necessary physical strength to do.

My fourth point:  There are more men than women in high paying jobs that require a PhD (or better), because there are more men who are willing to spend that many years in school.  

Now having said all that, the ONLY stats that mean anything are the ones that compare apples to apples. I'm not saying pay is fair at ALL companies, but you must at least use meaningful stats.



Obama is just campaigning for the women’s vote, and course many of the liberal mainstream media jumped on Obama’s lie and repeated in print, on the air and internet.  They all want women to think that Obama is their hero and that he really cares for them.

However, his own government says that Obama’s 77% figure is far from accurate.  In 2009, the US Labor Department gender wage gap had shrunk to 95%, not 77%.  Their report stated:
"A greater percentage of women than men tend to work part-time. Part-time work tends to pay less than full-time work. A greater percentage of women than men tend to leave the labor force for childbirth, childcare and elder care. Some of the wage gap is explained by the percentage of women who were not in the labor force during previous years, the age of women, and the number of children in the home. Women, especially working mothers, tend to value 'family friendly' workplace policies more than men. Some of the wage gap is explained by industry and occupation, particularly, the percentage of women who work in the industry and occupation."

"Research also suggests that differences not incorporated into the model due to data limitations may account for part of the remaining gap. ...(M)uch of the literature, including the Bureau of Labor Statistics Highlights of Women's Earnings, focus on wages rather than total compensation. Research indicates that women may value non-wage benefits more than men do, and as a result prefer to take a greater portion of their compensation in the form of health insurance and other fringe benefits."

If you don’t want to believe the Labor Department, what about a 2011 report from USA Today that reported that women in Atlanta Georgia earned around 21% more than men.  They report also stated:
"Women ages 22 to 30 with no husband and no kids earn a median $27,000 a year, 8 percent more than comparable men in the top 366 metropolitan areas, according to 2008 U.S. Census Bureau data. ..."

"The trend is especially apparent in cities where minority groups make up more than half the population. Among blacks and Hispanics, women are more than twice as likely as men to earn college degrees."

 

No comments:

Post a Comment